The foldable phone market is heating up, with compelling options emerging beyond Samsung. The Honor Magic V Flip 2 and Tecno Phantom V Flip2 represent two distinct approaches to the flip phone formula – one leveraging flagship silicon and a brighter display, the other prioritizing aggressive charging and a more accessible price point. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and display quality, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and significantly brighter display justify the price premium. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 offers a compelling alternative for those seeking fast charging and a more budget-friendly foldable.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 21 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 21 | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.1 x 75.6 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.2 x 75.6 x 15.5 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.8 x 73.4 x 16 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1232 x 2868 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, Dolby Vision, BT.2020, 5000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, HIOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, ASHA | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 42 min
50W wireless
5W reverse wired
Reverse wireless | 70W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Po 5500 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Silver, Gray, Blue | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Models | CLE-AN00 | - |
Honor Magic V Flip 2
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially better camera image quality
- Higher price point
- Slower charging compared to Tecno
Tecno Phantom V Flip2
- Faster charging speeds (70W wired, 50W wireless)
- More affordable price
- Competitive battery life
- Less powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- Dimmer display, less visible in sunlight
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic V Flip 2 boasts a substantial advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1786 nits. This is nearly double the 893 nits of the Tecno Phantom V Flip2, translating to significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the higher brightness of the Honor model, combined with potential LTPO implementation (unspecified in data but likely given the flagship positioning), suggests superior power efficiency and smoother refresh rate scaling. The Tecno's lower brightness may require users to increase brightness levels, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, detailed camera specifications are absent. However, given the positioning of both devices, we can infer some differences. The Honor, being the higher-end model, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and improved image processing algorithms. While both phones likely include standard features like night mode and portrait mode, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) offers more advanced capabilities for computational photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Honor is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor Magic V Flip 2 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), while the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 8020 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process offers superior transistor density and thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 8020’s 6nm node. This translates to sustained performance under load, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – with a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz – provides a significant performance uplift over the Dimensity 8020’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz. Users engaging in resource-intensive applications will notice a tangible difference.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic V Flip 2 achieves an active use battery score of 12:43h, slightly exceeding the Tecno Phantom V Flip2’s 11:37h. While the difference isn’t massive, it’s likely attributable to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior power efficiency. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 compensates with significantly faster charging: 70W wired, reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 45 minutes, compared to the Honor’s 80W wired (100% in 42 minutes). The Tecno also offers 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Honor. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the Tecno’s charging capabilities are a major advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic V Flip 2 if you demand the fastest possible performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if a vibrant, easily visible display is crucial for outdoor use. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 if you prioritize rapid charging speeds and value a more affordable entry point into the world of foldable phones, accepting some compromises in processing power and screen brightness.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8020 in the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8020 is a capable chipset, it won't deliver the same sustained performance as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Honor Magic V Flip 2. Expect to potentially lower graphics settings and experience some frame rate drops during extended gaming sessions in graphically intensive titles like Genshin Impact. The 6nm process and less powerful GPU are the limiting factors.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Honor Magic V Flip 2 compare to the 70W charging on the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 in real-world use?
Although the Honor Magic V Flip 2 has a slightly higher charging wattage (80W vs 70W), the difference in charging time to 100% is minimal (42 minutes vs 45 minutes). The Tecno Phantom V Flip2’s advantage lies in its faster initial charge – reaching 50% in just 15 minutes. This makes it ideal for quick top-ups when you're short on time.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 893 nits of the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 can appear significantly dimmer than the 1786 nits of the Honor Magic V Flip 2, especially when outdoors or in brightly lit environments. Users may find themselves constantly increasing the brightness on the Tecno, impacting battery life. The Honor offers a much more comfortable viewing experience in all lighting conditions.
