The foldable flip phone market is heating up, with the Honor Magic V Flip 2 and Oppo Find N3 Flip representing the latest generation of stylish and functional devices. While both aim to deliver a premium experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly in chipset choice and display technology. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which flip phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and display brightness, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and significantly brighter display offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Oppo Find N3 Flip counters with slightly better battery endurance, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 21 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.1 x 75.6 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.2 x 75.6 x 15.5 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1232 x 2868 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, Dolby Vision, BT.2020, 5000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF
48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, ASHA | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 42 min
50W wireless
5W reverse wired
Reverse wireless | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Silver, Gray, Blue | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | CLE-AN00 | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | - | About 1200 EUR |
Honor Magic V Flip 2
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Slightly shorter battery life in active use tests
- Potentially higher price point
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Slightly longer battery life
- Potentially more affordable price
- Oppo's reputation for natural image processing
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Dimmer display, less visible in sunlight
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic V Flip 2 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1786 nits, compared to the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s 939 nits. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility, giving the Honor a clear advantage in sunny conditions. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the higher brightness of the Honor suggests a more advanced panel construction or more aggressive power delivery. We lack information on refresh rates or PWM dimming, but the brightness disparity is a key differentiator. The Oppo's lower brightness doesn't necessarily mean a *bad* display, but it will struggle more in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks detailed camera specifications. However, given the market positioning of both devices, we can infer a focus on versatile camera systems. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. We can assume both phones will feature a primary wide-angle camera and an ultrawide, but the image processing style will likely differ. Oppo is known for its natural color science, while Honor often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information on video capabilities further complicates the comparison.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic V Flip 2 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (4nm) with its Cortex-X3 core at 3.05 GHz. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architectural improvements, particularly in the Adreno GPU, translate to superior graphics performance and more efficient power consumption during intensive tasks. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon’s newer architecture provides a clear edge. The Dimensity 9200 is still a capable performer, but will likely show its limitations in demanding games or sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip edges out the Honor Magic V Flip 2 in battery endurance, achieving 12:58 hours of active use compared to the Honor’s 12:43 hours. This difference, while not massive, is noticeable. However, the Honor compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired (100% in 42 minutes) and 50W wireless, compared to the Oppo’s 44W wired (50% in 23 minutes). The Honor’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, mitigating the slightly shorter battery life. The inclusion of 5W reverse wired and wireless charging on the Honor adds further versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic V Flip 2 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value a vibrant, easily visible display, even in bright sunlight. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prioritize maximizing battery life and prefer a more balanced approach to performance, accepting a trade-off in peak processing power for extended usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Honor Magic V Flip 2 get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is efficient, demanding games will inevitably generate heat. However, the Honor Magic V Flip 2's thermal design, combined with the chip's inherent efficiency, should prevent significant throttling and maintain consistent performance for extended periods. The 4nm process node contributes to better heat dissipation compared to older chipsets.
❓ How does the 44W charging on the Oppo Find N3 Flip compare to other flip phones in terms of real-world charging speed?
44W charging is relatively standard for flip phones, but slower than the 80W on the Honor. Expect approximately 30-40 minutes to reach 80% charge on the Oppo, while the Honor can achieve a full charge in 42 minutes. The difference is most noticeable when you need a quick top-up.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
While frustrating, it's common for initial specs to be limited. Both Honor and Oppo have a history of delivering competitive camera systems in their flip phones. Expect features like OIS and multiple lenses, but detailed image quality assessments will require independent reviews.
