Honor GT Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak gaming performance and blazing-fast 90W charging, the Honor GT Pro is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra offers a more polished, feature-rich experience with superior battery life and a more versatile camera system, making it the better choice for the average power user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor GT Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 23 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 23 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Giant rhino glass), aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 162.1 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.38 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Giant rhino glass | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2800 pixels (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 107.9 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR Vivid | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 5W reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7200 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gold | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PPG-AN00 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 440 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Honor GT Pro
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Likely optimized for gaming with high clock speeds
- Battery life potentially lower than S24 Ultra
- Camera system likely less versatile than S24 Ultra
- Brand recognition and software support may be less established
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (13:49h active use)
- Versatile and high-quality camera system
- Mature software ecosystem and long-term support
- Slower 45W charging compared to Honor GT Pro
- CPU performance may be slightly lower than GT Pro
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Honor GT Pro’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s panel technology is known for its color accuracy and LTPO capabilities, dynamically adjusting refresh rates for power efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor use, while the LTPO tech contributes to its longer battery life.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S24 Ultra’s camera system is a known quantity, offering a versatile suite of lenses and advanced image processing. While specific details are missing for the Honor GT Pro, Samsung’s reputation for computational photography and video stabilization gives it an edge. The S24 Ultra’s larger sensor size (typically found in its main camera) and advanced OIS will result in better low-light performance and smoother video recording. The GT Pro will likely focus on delivering vibrant, shareable images, but may lack the nuanced detail and dynamic range of the S24 Ultra.
Performance
The Honor GT Pro’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.47 GHz, represents a significant leap in CPU performance. This contrasts with the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3.39 GHz peak), which utilizes a more conventional Cortex-X4 architecture. The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer improved thermal efficiency, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance during extended gaming sessions. However, the S24 Ultra’s optimized software and cooling system may mitigate the raw clock speed difference. The GT Pro’s architecture is geared towards maximizing single-core performance, beneficial for many mobile games.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieves an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. The Honor GT Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 90W wired charging is a significant advantage, potentially offering a full charge in under 30 minutes. The S24 Ultra’s 45W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and reaching 65% in 30 minutes, is considerably slower. The GT Pro’s faster charging is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, while the S24 Ultra prioritizes overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor GT Pro if you need uncompromising CPU and GPU power for mobile gaming, demand the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to trade some camera versatility for raw performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a more balanced flagship experience with exceptional battery life, a class-leading camera system, and the broader ecosystem benefits of the Samsung brand.