Honor GT 2 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing unadulterated speed and gaming prowess, the Honor GT 2 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera versatility and software experience, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor GT 2 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Giant rhino glass), aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Giant rhino glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2800 pixels (~447 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 110.5 cm2 | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR Vivid | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gold | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | - | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | - | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor GT 2 Pro
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Camera specs are unknown, potentially lagging behind Pixel
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Smooth and intuitive software experience
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging speeds compared to Honor GT 2 Pro
- Tensor G2 processor is less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Honor GT 2 Pro’s display specs are not provided, Honor typically utilizes high-quality panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior OLED experience with deep blacks. Both devices likely employ high refresh rate displays, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Honor.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but approach photography differently. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms, delivering consistently excellent results in various conditions. While specific sensor details for the Honor GT 2 Pro are missing, the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system benefits from advanced features like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation, while the Honor GT 2 Pro may prioritize speed and raw image data. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Honor makes a direct comparison challenging, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s established reputation gives it an edge.
Performance
The Honor GT 2 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) is a significant leap forward, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M cores. This contrasts sharply with the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 (5nm) which utilizes a more conventional octa-core setup with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 promises superior power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to sustained peak performance during intensive tasks. The Honor is expected to dominate in CPU and GPU benchmarks, offering a smoother experience for gamers and power users. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, excelling in areas like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both the Honor GT 2 Pro and Google Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing approaches. The Honor GT 2 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of rapidly replenishing the battery. The Pixel 7 Pro offers 23W wired charging with PD3.0 and 50% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. While the Pixel 7 Pro offers wireless charging convenience, the Honor GT 2 Pro’s significantly faster wired charging is a major advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor GT 2 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games, frequent multitasking, and rapid charging. It’s built for power users who value speed above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s computational photography, and a more balanced overall package with a focus on AI-driven features.