Honor 90 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Honor 90 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, while the 1176 nits peak brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo remains a strong contender with its fast charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 90 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 07 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.37 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~435 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | REA-AN00, REA-NX9 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 204.71 / $ 449.99 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Honor 90
- More powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher endurance rating suggests better overall efficiency
- Charging speed is slightly slower than the Motorola
- May be slightly heavier due to larger battery or cooling system (data not provided)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially lighter and more compact design (data not provided)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Lower peak display brightness
- Lower endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Honor 90 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1176 nits compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This 103-nit difference translates to significantly better outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED panels, the Honor 90’s higher peak brightness and potentially superior color calibration (though not specified in the data) provide a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the Honor 90’s brighter panel will likely consume more power at maximum brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but the provided data doesn’t allow for a detailed comparison. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The focus should be on real-world image samples to determine which phone delivers more pleasing results in various conditions. Ignoring the likely inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices, the primary camera performance will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor 90 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition (4nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The Snapdragon’s 4nm fabrication process offers superior power efficiency compared to the Dimensity’s 6nm node, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Architecturally, the Snapdragon employs a 1+3+4 core configuration with Cortex-A710 cores, while the Dimensity uses a 2+6 configuration with Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The A710 cores in the Snapdragon generally offer higher single-core performance, beneficial for responsive app launches and smoother multitasking. The Edge 40 Neo's Dimensity 7030, however, is optimized for efficiency and may excel in less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices achieve an active use score of 10:28h, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s lower endurance rating of 80h versus the Honor 90’s 95h. This discrepancy likely stems from the Honor 90’s more efficient chipset. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo compensates with faster charging – 68W wired, claiming 50% charge in 15 minutes – while the Honor 90 offers 66W wired charging. The 5W reverse wired charging on both devices is a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 90 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and games with consistent performance, and if a bright, vibrant display is a priority. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value rapid charging speeds and a sleek, lightweight design, and are less concerned with pushing the absolute limits of processing power.