The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 80 and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Honor 80 boasts a stylish design and fast charging, the Poco F5 offers superior performance and value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.9 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), AF
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | ANN-AN00 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 370 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Honor 80
- Stylish Design
- Fast 66W Charging
- Decent Camera
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Shorter Battery Life
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Excellent Value
- Design less premium than Honor 80
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 963 nits peak brightness is noticeably higher than the Honor 80's, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Poco F5 also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent image quality. While the Honor 80's display is decent, it lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Poco F5.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 likely holds a slight edge due to the newer image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. While detailed camera comparisons require extensive testing, initial impressions suggest the Poco F5 captures slightly more detailed and vibrant photos. Both offer standard photo and video modes.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset truly shines. It's a substantial upgrade over the Honor 80's Snapdragon 782G, offering significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. Expect noticeably better gaming performance and quicker app loading times on the Poco F5.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, with an endurance rating of 118 hours. This is significantly better than the Honor 80. While the Honor 80's 66W charging is fast, the Poco F5's 67W charging, combined with its larger battery capacity, provides a longer-lasting and more convenient experience.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 is ideal for users prioritizing aesthetics and fast charging, and who don't demand the absolute highest performance. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is the better choice for gamers, power users, and anyone seeking a phone with a vibrant display and long-lasting battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset.
❓ Does the Honor 80 have expandable storage?
No, the Honor 80 does not offer expandable storage via microSD card.
❓ Which phone charges faster?
The Honor 80 charges slightly faster with its 66W wired charging, but the Poco F5's 67W charging is still very quick.