The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 80 and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the crown for overall value, boasting exceptional battery life, a vibrant display, and reliable performance. The Honor 80 shines with its faster charging and stylish design, but falls short in battery endurance. Ultimately, the A54 offers a more well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 73.9 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.9 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), AF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | ANN-AN00 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 370 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 80
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Stylish Design
- Slightly better gaming performance
- Shorter Battery Life
- Less impressive camera in low light
- Less water resistance
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Excellent Camera Quality
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP67)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding games
- Design is less striking
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a significantly more vibrant and immersive viewing experience compared to the Honor 80. While the Honor 80's display is decent, it lacks the A54's punch and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54 consistently delivers excellent photo and video quality, with improved dynamic range and color accuracy. The Honor 80's camera is capable, but struggles in low-light conditions compared to the A54. The A54's video recording capabilities are also superior.
Performance
The Snapdragon 782G in the Honor 80 offers a slight edge in raw processing power, particularly in gaming. However, the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is well-optimized and provides smooth, everyday performance. Real-world usage differences are minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54's battery life is a standout feature, easily lasting a full day of heavy use and boasting an impressive endurance rating. The Honor 80's battery life is adequate, but falls short of the A54's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek aesthetic. If you value a stylish design and don't mind slightly shorter battery life, the Honor 80 is a good choice. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking long-lasting battery life, a bright and vivid display, and a dependable camera system. It's a great all-arounder for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Honor, making the Galaxy A54 a more future-proof choice.
❓ Is the Honor 80 worth it if I prioritize fast charging?
Yes, the Honor 80's 66W charging is significantly faster than the Galaxy A54's 25W, making it a good option if charging speed is a top priority.