The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Honor 80 Pro and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. Both pack the powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, but differ significantly in other areas. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Honor 80 Pro thanks to its superior display brightness, faster wireless charging, and potentially better camera versatility. However, the Honor 80 Pro boasts a stylish design and reverse wireless charging, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing aesthetics and convenience. Ultimately, the Poco F5 Pro offers more value for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
50 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Black, White |
| Models | ANP-AN00 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 420 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 80 Pro
- Stylish Design
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Good Selfie Camera
- Flagship Performance
- Lower Display Brightness
- Slower Charging (wired & wireless)
- Camera versatility potentially limited
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Faster Wireless Charging
- Excellent Battery Life
- Versatile Camera System (expected)
- Flagship Performance
- Design less premium than Honor 80 Pro
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits significantly surpasses the Honor 80 Pro's, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Honor 80 Pro's display is good, the Poco F5 Pro's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant picture. Both utilize AMOLED panels with high refresh rates, ensuring smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the Poco F5 Pro is generally expected to have a more versatile camera system. The Honor 80 Pro is known for its selfie camera capabilities, but the Poco F5 Pro likely offers a wider range of lenses and features for diverse shooting scenarios. Detailed camera comparisons would require in-depth testing.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, guaranteeing flagship-level performance. Expect seamless multitasking, smooth gaming, and snappy app launches on both devices. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal, depending on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Honor 80 Pro's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the Poco F5 Pro's optimization and potentially larger battery contribute to its superior endurance. The Poco F5 Pro also offers significantly faster wireless charging (30W) compared to the Honor 80 Pro's 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize a premium design, reverse wireless charging, and a generally well-rounded experience. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the better choice for those seeking a brighter display, faster wireless charging, and a more feature-rich camera system, all while maintaining excellent performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer excellent gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. Differences will be minimal and depend on software optimization.
❓ Is the Honor 80 Pro's design worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize a premium design and reverse wireless charging, the Honor 80 Pro might be worth the extra cost. However, the Poco F5 Pro offers more features for the price.
