Honor 80 Pro vs. vivo X80 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 80 Pro emerges as the slightly better value. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides superior thermal management and comparable performance to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the vivo X80 Pro, coupled with a more efficient power draw. While the vivo X80 Pro boasts faster charging, the Honor 80 Pro’s overall balance makes it the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 80 Pro | vivo X80 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, April 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.6 x 75.3 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 215 g / 219 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom, gimbal OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Snapdragon)/ 5.3 (Dimensity), A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 38 min 50W wireless, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | ANP-AN00 | V2185A, V2145 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 850 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
Honor 80 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Strong overall value proposition
- Slower charging speeds compared to vivo X80 Pro
- Limited information on display specifications
vivo X80 Pro
- Extremely fast 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potential CPU performance advantage with Dimensity 9000 variant
- Likely superior camera system
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially lower battery efficiency
Display Comparison
Both phones lack detailed display specs in the provided data, but the vivo X80 Pro is confirmed to reach 1014 nits of peak brightness, suggesting a notably more visible screen outdoors. Given both brands’ history, we can expect high-quality AMOLED panels with vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate information is a key omission, but both likely support at least 120Hz. Contrast ratios are listed as infinite for the vivo X80 Pro, a standard marketing claim for AMOLED displays. Without PWM dimming rates, it’s difficult to assess which phone is better for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having capable Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The absence of sensor size information is critical. However, the vivo X80 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a stronger emphasis on camera quality, potentially featuring a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Honor 80 Pro’s camera performance will likely be very good, but the vivo X80 Pro may have an edge in low-light photography and dynamic range. The lack of information on OIS and lens apertures prevents a more definitive assessment. We can safely assume both phones will offer a versatile camera system, but the vivo X80 Pro likely holds a slight advantage.
Performance
The Honor 80 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a key advantage. While the vivo X80 Pro offers a choice of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (also 4nm) or Dimensity 9000 (4nm), the ‘+’ variant in the Honor 80 Pro signifies improved efficiency and thermal performance. Both CPUs share the same core configuration (1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510), but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 operates at a slightly higher clock speed (3.0 GHz vs 3.0 GHz for Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and 3.05 GHz for Dimensity 9000). This translates to sustained performance under load, reducing the likelihood of throttling during demanding tasks like gaming. The vivo X80 Pro’s Dimensity 9000 variant may offer a marginal CPU performance boost, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency is a significant benefit.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Pro boasts significantly faster charging with 80W wired (0-100% in 38 minutes) and 50W wireless (0-100% in 50 minutes), while the Honor 80 Pro offers 66W wired (30-50% in 15 minutes) and 5W reverse wired. Both phones have an endurance rating of 79 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). The vivo X80 Pro’s charging speed is a major convenience factor, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. However, the Honor 80 Pro’s more efficient chipset may offset the slower charging speed for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 80 Pro if you prioritize sustained gaming performance and all-day battery life without compromising on speed. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask, game for extended periods, or simply want a phone that won’t overheat. Buy the vivo X80 Pro if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds (80W wired and 50W wireless) and value the flexibility of a Dimensity 9000 variant, potentially offering a slight edge in raw CPU performance, though at the cost of potentially higher temperatures.