Honor 80 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and software experience, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the Honor 80 Pro delivers superior gaming performance and faster charging, making it ideal for power users and mobile gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 80 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | ANP-AN00 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 420 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 80 Pro
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially better gaming performance due to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- More efficient chipset (4nm)
- Camera system details are unknown
- Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- AI-powered features and seamless software experience
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Honor 80 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Honor typically focuses on color accuracy. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. Both likely utilize high refresh rate panels, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Honor 80 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped for photo and video, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, known for its excellent dynamic range and realistic color reproduction. The Honor 80 Pro’s camera system details are missing, but Honor often emphasizes high-resolution sensors and vibrant image processing. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing pipeline is heavily reliant on the Tensor G2’s AI capabilities, enabling features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. Without specific sensor details for the Honor 80 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Pixel 7 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 80 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, promising strong single-core performance. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 (5nm) prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, with a slightly lower peak clock speed of 2.85 GHz on its Cortex-X1 cores. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally offers better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Honor 80 Pro is likely to excel in GPU-intensive tasks, while the Pixel 7 Pro shines in AI-powered features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The Honor 80 Pro supports 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 30-50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Pixel 7 Pro is limited to 23W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 7 Pro compensates with 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features the Honor 80 Pro offers at a slower 5W for reverse wired charging. The Honor 80 Pro’s faster wired charging is a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 80 Pro if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value rapid 66W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prioritize a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software updates, and intelligent features powered by Google’s AI.