The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Honor 80 Pro Flat and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. Both pack the powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, but differ significantly in other areas. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Honor 80 Pro thanks to its superior display brightness, faster wireless charging, and potentially better camera versatility. However, the Honor 80 Pro might appeal to those prioritizing a unique design and potentially better software support, depending on regional availability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 06 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 06 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g or 193 g (6.56 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Black, White |
| Models | - | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 450 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- Stylish Design
- Fast 66W Wired Charging
- Potentially Strong Selfie Camera
- Unknown Display Brightness
- Potentially Less Optimized Software
- Unspecified Battery Capacity
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Bright 1059 nits Display
- Fast 67W Wired & 30W Wireless Charging
- Excellent Battery Life (99h Endurance)
- Versatile Camera System
- Design may be less distinctive
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1059 nits compared to the Honor 80 Pro's likely lower peak brightness (spec not provided, but generally lower than Poco). The Poco's infinite contrast ratio also suggests superior image quality. While the Honor 80 Pro likely has a good display, the Poco F5 Pro takes the lead here.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both phones. However, the Poco F5 Pro is generally known for its versatile camera system. The Honor 80 Pro is expected to have a strong selfie camera, but overall camera capabilities are difficult to definitively compare without more detailed specifications and reviews.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, guaranteeing flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and snappy app launches on both devices. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Honor 80 Pro's battery capacity is unknown, but the 66W wired charging is competitive. The Poco F5 Pro's 30W wireless charging is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 Pro Flat is ideal for users who appreciate a stylish design and are comfortable with potentially less optimized software. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a great choice for those prioritizing a vibrant display, fast charging (especially wireless), and a well-rounded feature set at a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
Both phones utilize the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, so performance will be very similar. Expect smooth and responsive operation on both devices.
❓ Is the Honor 80 Pro's design worth the trade-offs?
If you prioritize aesthetics and a unique look, the Honor 80 Pro's design might be appealing. However, be aware of potential compromises in other areas like display brightness and software optimization.
