The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Honor 80 Pro Flat and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor 80 Pro Flat boasts significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and faster charging. However, the Galaxy A54 shines with its exceptional battery life, vibrant display, and Samsung's reliable software support. It depends on your priorities: power or endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 06 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 06 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g or 193 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- Flagship-level performance
- Fast 66W charging
- Stylish design
- High resolution main camera (likely)
- Battery life not as impressive as A54
- Software support potentially less extensive than Samsung
- May lack some Samsung-specific features
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Exceptional battery life
- Vibrant and bright display
- Reliable Samsung software
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Mid-range performance
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Honor 80 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with its impressive 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. While the Honor 80 Pro Flat has a good display, it doesn't quite match the A54's visual punch. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Galaxy A54 is known for its consistent and reliable image processing, producing pleasing photos in various conditions. The Honor 80 Pro Flat likely has a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better low-light performance, but image quality can be subjective. Video recording capabilities are comparable.
Performance
Here, the Honor 80 Pro Flat absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, significantly outperforming the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and significantly better gaming performance on the Honor.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h is exceptional, providing multiple days of use on a single charge. The Honor 80 Pro Flat, while offering 66W fast charging, doesn't match the A54's overall battery capacity and efficiency.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 Pro Flat is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a great choice for those seeking long battery life, a beautiful display, and a dependable, user-friendly experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat is significantly better for gaming due to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
❓ Does the Galaxy A54 have water resistance?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A54 has an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat charges much faster with 66W charging (around 35-40 minutes), while the Galaxy A54 takes longer with 25W charging (around 1.5-2 hours).
