The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 80 GT and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer impressive specs and features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is the perfect fit.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor 80 GT boasts a flagship Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, delivering superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Poco F5 shines with its exceptional battery life, brighter display, and potentially better value proposition. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: raw power or all-day endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 26 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 26 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g or 195 g (6.60 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | AGT-AN00 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Honor 80 GT
- Flagship Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Fast 66W charging
- Sleek design
- Good performance for gaming
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Camera performance may not be top-tier
- Price may be higher than Poco F5
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Faster charging (PD3.0)
- Competitive price
- Good camera versatility
- Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset (less powerful than 8+ Gen 1)
- Design may be less premium
- Performance not as high as Honor 80 GT
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the lead here. While the Honor 80 GT has a good display, the Poco F5's measured 963 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio offer a significantly more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Expect better outdoor visibility and richer colors on the Poco F5.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. However, based on general expectations, the Poco F5 likely offers a more versatile camera system with potentially better image processing. The Honor 80 GT's camera is expected to be competent, but may not match the Poco F5's overall capabilities. Further reviews are needed for a definitive answer.
Performance
The Honor 80 GT's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is the clear winner in this category. It's a flagship-level chipset that provides noticeably faster processing speeds and smoother performance compared to the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. This translates to quicker app loading, better multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life. Its 'Active use score' of 11:52h and 'Endurance rating' of 118h suggest significantly longer usage times compared to the Honor 80 GT. While the Honor 80 GT's 66W charging is fast, the Poco F5's 67W charging combined with its larger battery capacity provides a more compelling battery experience.
Buying Guide
The Honor 80 GT is ideal for gamers, power users, and those who prioritize performance above all else. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a great choice for users who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Honor 80 GT is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 offers significantly better battery life, lasting much longer on a single charge.
❓ Is the Honor 80 GT worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize performance and gaming, the Honor 80 GT's extra cost may be justified. Otherwise, the Poco F5 offers excellent value for money.
