Poco F4 vs Honor 70: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and gaming performance, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Honor 70’s Snapdragon 778G+. However, the Honor 70 offers a very competitive package, and its slightly better battery endurance and potentially more refined software experience may appeal to some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70
- Sleek and stylish design
- Fast initial charging speed (60% in 20 mins)
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset
- Dimmer display compared to Poco F4
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster full charge time (100% in 38 mins)
- Potentially less refined software experience
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1003 nits compared to the Honor 70’s 790 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (implied by contrast ratio), the Poco F4’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and usable experience in bright environments. The lack of specified refresh rates for both devices is a notable omission, but typical for this price point, we can assume both are 120Hz.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little specific detail. Without sensor size or megapixel counts, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 offers a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a drawback. Users should expect similar performance in good lighting conditions, but the Poco F4 likely has an edge in challenging scenarios due to its superior processing power. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of camera modes, but the quality of the final output will depend heavily on software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor 70’s Snapdragon 778G+ (6nm). The 870 features a faster prime core (3.2 GHz Kryo 585 vs 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78) and a more powerful GPU. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance. While the 6nm process of the 778G+ offers some efficiency gains, the architectural advantages of the 870 outweigh this benefit. The Poco F4 is the clear choice for users who demand the most from their smartphone.
Battery Life
Both the Honor 70 and Poco F4 achieve an endurance rating of 100-101 hours, indicating comparable battery life. However, their charging speeds differ. The Poco F4 supports 67W wired charging, reaching 100% in 38 minutes, while the Honor 70 offers 66W charging, reaching 60% in 20 minutes. While the Honor 70 charges quickly initially, the Poco F4’s ability to fully charge in under 40 minutes is more convenient. The Honor 70 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Poco F4, allowing it to top up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 if you need a stylish, well-rounded phone with a good camera and a focus on everyday usability. It’s ideal for social media enthusiasts and users who value a balanced experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. It’s the better choice for power users and those who want the most performance for their money.