Honor 70 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?

The Honor 70 and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they take different approaches. The Honor 70 focuses on a sleek design and rapid charging, while the Galaxy A73 5G emphasizes a larger display and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Honor 70 emerges as the stronger choice. Its 66W charging significantly outperforms the A73’s 25W, and the slightly tweaked Snapdragon 778G+ offers a marginal performance edge. While the A73 boasts a larger screen, the Honor 70’s brighter display and faster charging make it the more practical daily driver.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor 70 Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China-
Launch
Announced2022, May 302022, March 17
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 02Available. Released 2022, April 22
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back-
Dimensions161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in)163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight178 g (6.28 oz)181 g (6.38 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 642LAdreno 642L
OSAndroid 12, Magic UI 6.1Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single32 MP, f/2.4, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens-
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired, 60% in 20 min 5W reverse wired25W wired
TypeLi-Po 4800 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMidnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal SilverGray, Mint, White
ModelsFNE-AN00, FNE-NX9SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS
Price£ 201.00 / € 189.90About 600 EUR
SAR-1.14 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-1.28 W/kg (head)     1.42 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 100h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -29.4 LUFS (Average) -

Honor 70

  • Significantly faster 66W charging
  • Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility

  • Limited camera details in provided specs
  • Software experience may not appeal to all users

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

  • Larger display for immersive media consumption
  • Samsung’s One UI software ecosystem
  • Potentially longer battery life (speculation)

  • Slow 25W charging
  • Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
  • Display likely less bright than Honor 70

Display Comparison

The Honor 70 boasts a measured peak brightness of 790 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright sunlight. While the Galaxy A73 5G’s display specs aren’t explicitly provided, Samsung typically utilizes Super AMOLED panels known for vibrant colors. However, the Honor 70’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), typical of OLED technology. The A73’s larger screen size is a benefit for media consumption, but the Honor 70’s brightness and potentially better color accuracy (based on Honor’s display tuning) give it an edge for everyday use.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both feature a primary wide-angle lens, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, the A73’s camera system is likely to prioritize Samsung’s image processing style, often characterized by vibrant colors and boosted saturation. The Honor 70 may lean towards a more natural look. Without specific sensor size and aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Honor 70’s potential for more refined image processing gives it a slight advantage.

Performance

Both the Honor 70 and Galaxy A73 5G are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G series. However, the Honor 70 utilizes the Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6nm), while the A73 uses the standard Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The ‘+’ variant in the Honor 70 features slightly higher CPU clock speeds – 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2.4 GHz in the A73, along with 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 3x2.2 GHz. This translates to a small but measurable performance boost in demanding tasks. Both phones share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. While the difference isn’t massive, the Honor 70 will likely exhibit slightly smoother performance in graphically intensive games and multitasking. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, impacting overall system responsiveness.

Battery Life

The Honor 70 boasts an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting solid battery life. Crucially, it supports 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 60% charge in just 20 minutes. The Galaxy A73 5G is limited to 25W wired charging, a significant difference. While the A73 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (speculation based on typical Samsung A-series sizing), the Honor 70’s faster charging is a game-changer for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The Honor 70 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor 70 if you prioritize fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more responsive user experience. It’s ideal for users who are frequently on the go and need to quickly top up their battery. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a larger screen for media consumption, value Samsung’s One UI software, and aren’t as concerned about charging speed or a minor performance difference.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G+ in the Honor 70 offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the 778G in the Galaxy A73?
While both chipsets are capable, the Snapdragon 778G+ in the Honor 70 provides a slight performance edge due to its higher clock speeds. This translates to marginally smoother frame rates in demanding games, but the difference won’t be dramatic. Both phones will likely handle most mobile games at medium to high settings without issue.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Honor 70 compared to the 25W charging on the Galaxy A73 in real-world usage?
The Honor 70’s 66W charging is significantly faster. It can reach 60% charge in approximately 20 minutes, while the Galaxy A73’s 25W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This makes the Honor 70 ideal for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the camera on the Honor 70 better suited for low-light photography than the Galaxy A73?
Without detailed sensor information, it's difficult to say definitively. However, Honor often focuses on computational photography to enhance low-light performance. It's likely the Honor 70 will offer competitive low-light capabilities, potentially with more natural-looking results compared to Samsung’s typically vibrant processing.