Honor continues to deliver compelling mid-range smartphones, and the Honor 70 and Magic5 Lite are prime examples. Both offer attractive designs and feature-rich experiences, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one is the perfect fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic5 Lite edges out the Honor 70 thanks to its superior battery life and brighter display, despite a slightly less powerful chipset. However, the Honor 70's faster charging and potentially better camera processing make it a strong contender, especially for those prioritizing speed and image quality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2023, February 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF
50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min
5W reverse wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Titanium Silver |
| Models | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 | RMO-NX1, RMO-NX3 |
| Price | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 | About 190 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 100h
|
Endurance rating 111h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
-31.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 387250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1912 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G+)
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Sleek Design
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- Lower Max Brightness
- May be more expensive
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Longer Battery Life
- Brighter Display
- More Affordable
- Good Value for Money
- Less Powerful Processor
- Slower Charging (40W)
- Potentially Less Refined Camera
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Lite boasts a noticeably brighter display at 864 nits compared to the Honor 70's 790 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), resulting in vibrant colors and deep blacks. While both are LCD panels, the Magic5 Lite's higher brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Honor 70 might have slightly better color accuracy depending on calibration, but this is difficult to confirm without further testing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Honor 70 is generally expected to have slightly better image processing due to the more powerful chipset. The Magic5 Lite's camera hardware is comparable, but the 778G+ allows for more advanced computational photography features. Low-light performance and video recording quality are areas where the Honor 70 potentially shines.
Performance
The Honor 70's Snapdragon 778G+ 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Magic5 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and applications. The 778G+ offers better GPU performance and overall responsiveness. The Magic5 Lite is still capable for everyday tasks, but may struggle with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Lite takes a clear lead in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 111 hours compared to the Honor 70's 100 hours. While both offer respectable battery performance, the Magic5 Lite's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset contribute to its longer runtime. The Honor 70 does offer faster 66W wired charging, while the Magic5 Lite has 40W charging.
Buying Guide
The Honor 70 is ideal for users who value faster charging, a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks, and potentially more refined camera processing. The Honor Magic5 Lite is a better choice for those prioritizing long battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more budget-friendly price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Honor 70 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset.
❓ Does the Honor Magic5 Lite support fast charging?
Yes, the Honor Magic5 Lite supports 40W wired charging, which is still relatively fast, but slower than the Honor 70's 66W charging.
❓ Which phone has a better camera for selfies?
Both phones have decent front-facing cameras, but detailed comparisons would require further testing. Both likely offer beauty modes and portrait features.
❓ Are the displays similar in quality?
Both use LCD panels with excellent contrast. The Magic5 Lite's higher brightness makes it better for outdoor use, while the Honor 70 might have slightly better color accuracy.
