Xiaomi 12S Pro vs Honor 70 Pro+: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi 12S Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, coupled with 120W wired and 50W wireless charging. However, the Honor 70 Pro+ remains a strong contender, particularly for those valuing a potentially more efficient chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro+ | Xiaomi 12S Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 17 | Available. Released 2022, July 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 203 g / 204 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP. f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@30/60fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Gray, White, Purple, Green |
| Models | HPB-AN00 | 2206122SC |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 670 EUR |
Honor 70 Pro+
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 9000 chipset
- 100W fast wired charging
- Likely refined software experience with MagicOS
- Slightly lower peak CPU performance
- No wireless charging support
Xiaomi 12S Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially superior gaming performance
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 can run hotter under sustained load
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-quality OLED panels, the provided data doesn't detail specifics like resolution or refresh rate. However, the charging capabilities suggest the Xiaomi 12S Pro may prioritize peak power delivery, potentially impacting display brightness. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s image signal processor (ISP) could also contribute to slightly more accurate color reproduction. Without further display specs, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on maximizing display capabilities.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks camera specifications, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given the flagship positioning, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems with capable main sensors. Xiaomi’s image processing tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor often aims for a more natural look. The absence of sensor size information is critical; a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. Without this data, we can only speculate that the 12S Pro’s Snapdragon ISP might offer slightly faster image processing speeds.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12S Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3.19 GHz Cortex-X2) boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed compared to the Honor 70 Pro+'s Dimensity 9000 (3.05 GHz Cortex-X2). Both utilize the same Cortex-A710 and A510 core configuration, but the Snapdragon’s architecture and 4nm process generally translate to superior sustained performance and thermal efficiency. While the Dimensity 9000 is a powerful chip, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its optimized power draw, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The 12S Pro’s Adreno GPU also provides a performance advantage over the Mali-G710 MC10 in the Honor 70 Pro+.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12S Pro’s charging capabilities are a clear standout. Its 120W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 19 minutes, a significant advantage over the Honor 70 Pro+'s 100W charging (60% in 15 minutes). Furthermore, the 12S Pro adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Honor 70 Pro+. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speeds of the 12S Pro mitigate any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 10W reverse wireless charging on both devices is a minor convenience feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 Pro+ if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on efficient power management and a potentially smoother software experience (depending on MagicOS version). Buy the Xiaomi 12S Pro if you demand the highest possible performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast wired and wireless charging. The 12S Pro is also the better choice for users heavily invested in the Xiaomi ecosystem.