Honor 70 Pro+ vs OnePlus 10 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing charging speed and potentially better thermal management, the Honor 70 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 100W charging significantly outperforms the OnePlus 10 Pro, and the Dimensity 9000 offers competitive performance with potentially less throttling. However, OnePlus's software and established ecosystem remain strong contenders.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro+ | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 17 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP. f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | HPB-AN00 | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70 Pro+
- Significantly faster 100W charging
- Potentially better thermal management with Dimensity 9000
- Competitive performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Battery capacity unknown
- Software support and long-term updates are less established than OnePlus
OnePlus 10 Pro
- Established brand reputation and software ecosystem
- Wireless charging support
- Good display brightness and contrast
- Slower charging speeds, especially in North America
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, providing good visibility outdoors. While the Honor 70 Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar or slightly lower peak brightness given the focus on other areas. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality OLED panel, but without detailed color accuracy data for the Honor, a definitive winner is difficult to declare. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of flagship devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing for the Honor 70 Pro+. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s camera system is well-regarded, but its performance is heavily reliant on software processing. Without knowing the main sensor size, aperture, and OIS implementation on the Honor 70 Pro+, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s crucial to note that the presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant; image quality will be significantly limited by the small sensor size. The image processing style will also be a key differentiator – OnePlus tends towards a more saturated look, while Honor often aims for greater realism.
Performance
Both the Honor 70 Pro+ and OnePlus 10 Pro utilize a 4nm process, but employ different chipsets: the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 respectively. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, with its slightly higher clocked Cortex-A710 cores (2.50 GHz vs 2.85 GHz on the Dimensity), *on paper* suggests a slight CPU advantage. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The Dimensity 9000’s architecture, coupled with the 4nm process, may offer better sustained performance. Both devices feature the same Cortex-A510 efficiency cores, and both likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access. Real-world gaming performance will depend heavily on thermal management.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Honor 70 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown. The critical difference lies in charging speed: the Honor 70 Pro+ supports 100W wired charging, reaching 60% in just 15 minutes, while the OnePlus 10 Pro’s 80W (International) takes 32 minutes for a full charge. In North America, the OnePlus 10 Pro is limited to 65W, taking even longer. The Honor 70 Pro+ also offers 5W reverse wired charging, while the OnePlus 10 Pro includes both reverse wired and wireless charging. The faster charging of the Honor 70 Pro+ is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 Pro+ if you need blazing-fast charging, frequently use your phone throughout the day, and value a potentially cooler-running device. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you prefer a more refined software experience, benefit from wireless charging, and prioritize a brand with a longer track record of software updates and support.