Honor 70 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and seamless software integration, the Google Pixel 7a is the stronger choice. However, users demanding maximum processing power for gaming or demanding tasks will find the Honor 70 Pro+’s Dimensity 9000 a more compelling option, especially given its significantly faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 17 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP. f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | HPB-AN00 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Honor 70 Pro+
- Significantly faster 100W charging
- Potentially higher raw CPU performance with Dimensity 9000
- Likely faster RAM (LPDDR5X)
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera performance relies heavily on hardware, potentially lacking Pixel's computational advantages
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera with Google’s computational photography
- Clean Android software with guaranteed updates
- Strong AI features (Magic Eraser, Call Screen)
- Slow 18W charging
- Tensor G2 may be outperformed by Dimensity 9000 in raw processing power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Honor 70 Pro+’s display specifications aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a comparable OLED panel. However, the Pixel 7a’s display technology is known for its color accuracy, crucial for photo and video editing. The absence of LTPO on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal battery efficiency, a common feature on higher-end flagships.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in computational photography, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent results, even in challenging lighting conditions. While the Honor 70 Pro+’s camera specs are not detailed, its positioning suggests a focus on high-resolution sensors. The Pixel 7a’s strength lies in its software – features like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser are significant advantages. The Honor’s camera system will likely rely more on hardware capabilities, potentially offering different strengths in specific scenarios, but without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also highly regarded, benefiting from Google’s stabilization and dynamic range processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 70 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz. The Pixel 7a employs Google’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process. While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores reach 2.85 GHz, the Dimensity 9000’s architecture, particularly its more powerful Cortex-A710 cores, generally translates to superior raw CPU performance. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 9000 also offers better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Both phones utilize 8GB of RAM, but the Honor likely benefits from faster LPDDR5X memory, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Honor 70 Pro+’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of charging to 60% in just 15 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0, is significantly slower. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability – the Honor can quickly top up during short breaks, while the Pixel 7a requires more extended charging times. The Honor also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 Pro+ if you need a phone for intensive gaming, video editing, or frequently transfer large files, and value incredibly fast 100W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a consistently excellent camera experience, clean Android software with guaranteed updates, and benefit from Google’s AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen.