Honor 70 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor 70 Pro boasts significantly faster charging and a powerful chipset, while the Galaxy A54 excels in battery life and display brightness. Ultimately, the A54 offers a more well-rounded experience for most users, while the 70 Pro appeals to those prioritizing charging speed and performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 (5 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold, Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | SDY-AN00 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70 Pro
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8000 chipset
- Sleek and stylish design
- Likely good display quality
- Battery life not as impressive as A54
- Software support potentially less extensive than Samsung
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Reliable camera system
- Samsung's software and support
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos 1380 chipset slightly less powerful
- Design may be considered less exciting
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54's 980 nits peak brightness gives it a clear advantage in outdoor visibility. Its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Honor 70 Pro's display is likely good, but lacks the A54's brightness and contrast figures. Both likely feature OLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Galaxy A54 is known for its reliable image processing and consistent results. The Honor 70 Pro may offer unique camera features or a different aesthetic, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Both likely offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8000 in the Honor 70 Pro generally outperforms the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 in raw processing power. This translates to smoother gaming and faster app loading times on the Honor 70 Pro. However, Samsung's software optimization can mitigate some of this difference.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 is the clear winner in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours. The Honor 70 Pro's 100W charging is a massive advantage when you do need to top up, but it can't compensate for the A54's superior overall battery capacity.
Buying Guide
The Honor 70 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, gaming, and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a reliable camera system with Samsung's software support.