Honor 70 Pro vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X5 Pro offers a more complete flagship experience. While the Honor 70 Pro delivers impressive 100W charging and a capable processor, the Find X5 Pro’s potentially superior chipset (depending on region), established camera system, and slightly better battery endurance give it the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold, Silver | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | SDY-AN00 | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70 Pro
- Incredibly fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to Dimensity 8000
- Competitive price point
- Limited display specifications
- Camera system likely less refined than Oppo
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1/Dimensity 9000
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Potentially superior chipset performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1/Dimensity 9000)
- More versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse)
- Likely better camera system with Hasselblad color calibration
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Higher price point
- Slower wired charging than Honor 70 Pro
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Honor 70 Pro (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an infinite contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. While the Honor 70 Pro’s display specifications are less detailed, the Find X5 Pro’s likely benefits from a more sophisticated panel calibration and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, contributing to improved power efficiency. The lack of PWM frequency data for the Honor 70 Pro makes it difficult to assess its suitability for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Oppo Find X5 Pro likely benefits from a more mature image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, contributing to better low-light performance and dynamic range. While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the Find X5 Pro’s Hasselblad color calibration (a common Oppo feature) could provide a distinct advantage in color accuracy and overall image quality. The absence of specific details on the Honor 70 Pro’s camera sensors makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to match the Find X5 Pro’s potential in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X5 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (globally) or the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (China), both built on a 4nm process. This contrasts with the Honor 70 Pro’s 5nm Mediatek Dimensity 8000. While the 5nm node of the Dimensity 8000 offers good efficiency, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.00 GHz) and more powerful Adreno GPU provide a theoretical performance advantage, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. The Dimensity 9000 variant in the Chinese Find X5 Pro further elevates performance with slightly higher clock speeds. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known for potential thermal throttling under sustained load, a factor the Dimensity 8000 may mitigate due to its more conservative design. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences in core types (A710/A510 vs A78/A55) favor the Snapdragon/Dimensity 9000 in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the Honor 70 Pro). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Honor 70 Pro’s 100W wired charging can reach 60% in just 15 minutes, while the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s 80W wired charging takes 12 minutes to reach 50%. The Find X5 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (fully charging in 47 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Honor 70 Pro (which only offers 5W reverse wired). This makes the Honor 70 Pro ideal for users who prioritize extremely fast top-ups, while the Find X5 Pro provides more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast charging (100W) and are seeking a strong value proposition without sacrificing core performance. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and want a reliable daily driver. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you demand the highest possible performance, particularly for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate a more polished software experience and potentially better camera capabilities. It’s geared towards power users and photography enthusiasts.