Honor 70 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 7 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. However, the Honor 70 Pro+’s blistering 100W charging and potent Dimensity 9000 chipset make it a compelling option for power users and those frequently on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 70 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2652 pixels (~429 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6983 Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 8 MP. f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 60% in 15 min (advertised) 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | HPB-AN00 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Potentially more customizable Android experience
- Camera system likely less refined than Pixel 7 Pro
- Software update support may be less consistent
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Clean and streamlined software experience
- Guaranteed software updates and security patches
- Slower 23W charging
- Tensor G2 may not match Dimensity 9000 in raw CPU power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, suggesting a visibly brighter outdoor experience compared to the Honor 70 Pro+, for which brightness data is unavailable. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, indicating deep blacks. While the Honor 70 Pro+’s panel specifications aren’t detailed, the Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology allows for variable refresh rates, potentially improving battery efficiency by dynamically adjusting the refresh rate based on content. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is likely to offer superior viewing angles and color accuracy due to Google’s calibration.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is renowned for its computational photography capabilities, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for the Honor 70 Pro+, the Pixel 7 Pro’s strengths lie in its dynamic range, accurate color reproduction, and exceptional low-light performance. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in scenarios like portraits and astrophotography. The Honor 70 Pro+ may offer different lens options or a unique aesthetic, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s consistent image quality and software features give it a significant edge. We can assume the Pixel 7 Pro has superior video stabilization and processing capabilities.
Performance
The Honor 70 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, designed for peak performance. The Pixel 7 Pro, powered by the Google Tensor G2 (5nm), employs a Cortex-X1 prime core at 2.85 GHz. While the Dimensity 9000’s X2 core has a slight clock speed advantage, the Tensor G2’s 5nm process offers potentially better power efficiency. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 is specifically optimized for machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. Both devices utilize LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access, but the real-world performance difference will depend on software optimization and thermal management.
Battery Life
Both the Honor 70 Pro+ and Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Honor 70 Pro+’s 100W wired charging can replenish 60% of the battery in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage for users who need a quick power boost. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Honor 70 Pro+’s 5W reverse wired charging. The Honor 70 Pro+’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery capacity, making it ideal for users who frequently top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 70 Pro+ if you need exceptionally fast charging, prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks, and value a more customizable Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera system with Google’s computational photography prowess, a clean and streamlined software experience with guaranteed updates, and a more balanced overall package.