The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 70 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the clear winner, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and significantly better battery life. While the Honor 70 Lite offers a sleek design and competitive price, the A54's overall performance and features justify its slightly higher cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Magic UI 8 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | RBN-NX1 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 70 Lite
- Sleek and stylish design
- Competitive price
- Decent camera for social media
- 5G Connectivity
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery life
- Less refined camera processing
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent performance with Exynos 1380
- Bright and vibrant display
- Outstanding battery life
- Versatile and high-quality camera
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slightly higher price
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's display is a standout feature, reaching a peak brightness of 980 nits and offering an infinite contrast ratio. This translates to vibrant colors, excellent visibility in sunlight, and a more immersive viewing experience. The Honor 70 Lite's display is adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast, making it less enjoyable for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Samsung Galaxy A54 generally produces better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A54's image processing algorithms are more refined, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. The Honor 70 Lite's camera is decent for casual use, but lacks the A54's versatility and overall quality.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite's Snapdragon 480+ (8nm). The A54 handles demanding tasks and games with ease, while the Honor 70 Lite may experience occasional lag. The A54's more modern architecture and efficient manufacturing process contribute to its superior performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 119 hours and active use lasting over 11 hours. The Honor 70 Lite's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A54's impressive longevity. The A54's efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its exceptional battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Honor 70 Lite is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize aesthetics and a decent camera for social media. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with excellent performance, a vibrant display, and a versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor 70 Lite good for gaming?
The Honor 70 Lite can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag due to its less powerful chipset. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for serious mobile gamers.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung is known for providing longer software update support than Honor. The Galaxy A54 will likely receive more Android updates and security patches over its lifespan.
