Honor 500 Pro (Snapdragon 8 Elite) vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity 9000+): A Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw CPU performance and the fastest charging speeds, the Honor 500 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage. However, the Xiaomi 12 Pro remains a compelling option for those seeking a more globally available device with a refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 24 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 27 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 155.8 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.13 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2736 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 68mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5, Auracast, ASHA | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 50W wireless, 28% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | Gray, Blue |
| Models | MEP-AN00 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Unmatched CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Industry-leading 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially superior image processing from Snapdragon ISP
- China-exclusive availability limits access
- Software experience may be less refined than Xiaomi’s
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Globally available and widely supported
- Refined MIUI software experience
- Competitive performance from Dimensity 9000+
- Slower charging speeds compared to Honor 500 Pro
- Less efficient 4nm process may lead to more throttling
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high-quality AMOLED displays, the provided data focuses on internal components. We can infer that the Xiaomi 12 Pro, given its flagship positioning, likely incorporates LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering better power efficiency. However, without specific display specs for the Honor 500 Pro, a direct comparison is impossible. Both are likely to target 120Hz refresh rates and excellent color accuracy, but the Honor's display details remain unknown.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer camera specifics. However, given their flagship status, both devices likely feature multi-camera systems with a primary sensor exceeding 50MP. The Honor 500 Pro, benefiting from the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s advanced ISP, may offer superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s image processing is known for its vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor’s tends towards a more natural look. Without sensor size and aperture details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the Snapdragon’s ISP gives the Honor an edge in potential image quality.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Honor 500 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, fabricated on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and density compared to the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU architecture – with its 2x4.32 GHz ‘Phoenix L’ and 6x3.53 GHz ‘Phoenix M’ cores – is designed for sustained peak performance. This contrasts with the Dimensity 9000+'s more traditional Cortex-X2/A710/A510 configuration. The 3nm node allows the Snapdragon 8 Elite to deliver more performance at lower power consumption, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon's architecture is also expected to offer better single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading.
Battery Life
The Honor 500 Pro’s charging capabilities are a clear standout. Its 80W wired charging, coupled with 50W wireless charging and 28% charge in 15 minutes, significantly outpaces the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC4 support). While the Xiaomi 12 Pro offers respectable charging speeds, the Honor 500 Pro provides a much faster top-up experience. The impact of battery size isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the Honor 500 Pro mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 500 Pro (China) if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and if you value the fastest possible charging – both wired and wireless. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a more established brand with wider availability, a potentially more polished software experience, and a slightly more conservative approach to thermal management.