Honor 500 Pro vs. Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the Honor 500 Pro (China) takes the lead thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite and 80W wired/50W wireless charging. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro offers broader availability and a comparable experience, particularly in China with the Dimensity 9000 variant.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 24 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 27 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 155.8 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.13 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2736 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 68mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5, Auracast, ASHA | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 50W wireless, 28% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | MEP-AN00 | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Potentially unmatched performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Faster initial wireless charging (28% in 15 min)
- Reverse wired and wireless charging
- China-exclusive availability
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Global availability
- Excellent battery endurance (101h)
- Strong camera system with proven image processing
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle under sustained load
- Slower initial wireless charging compared to Honor
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright conditions. While the Honor 500 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, Honor typically employs high-quality panels. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating excellent black levels. Without PWM dimming rate data for the Honor 500 Pro, it’s difficult to assess potential eye strain compared to the Oppo, which is likely to have a high-frequency PWM implementation.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable Photo/Video capabilities, but specific sensor details are lacking for the Honor 500 Pro. The Oppo Find X5 Pro’s camera system is known for its excellent image processing and color science. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture of the Honor 500 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The presence of OIS on both is assumed, given their flagship status. The lack of detail regarding secondary sensors (ultrawide, telephoto) on the Honor 500 Pro makes a comprehensive camera assessment impossible.
Performance
The Honor 500 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance over the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) or Dimensity 9000 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU architecture (2x4.32 GHz Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Phoenix M) is expected to deliver superior multi-core and single-core performance compared to the Cortex-X2/A710/A510 configuration of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3.00 GHz/2.50 GHz/1.80 GHz) and Dimensity 9000 (3.05 GHz/2.85 GHz/1.80 GHz). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 3nm node also implies better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating solid battery life. Its 80W wired charging (50% in 12 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (100% in 47 minutes) are competitive. The Honor 500 Pro matches the 80W wired charging and offers 50W wireless charging, achieving 28% charge in just 15 minutes – a notably faster initial charge rate. The Honor 500 Pro also includes 5W reverse wired and wireless charging, a feature also present in the Oppo, albeit at 10W for wireless. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s improved efficiency could potentially offset any battery capacity differences, but without knowing the Honor 500 Pro’s battery size, a definitive statement is impossible.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 500 Pro (China) if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance currently available, coupled with incredibly rapid charging speeds, and are comfortable with a China-exclusive device. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you prioritize global availability, a refined software experience, and a well-rounded package with excellent battery endurance and a strong camera system, especially if you opt for the China-specific Dimensity 9000 version.