Honor 500 Pro vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Performance and Feature Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and blazing-fast charging, the Honor 500 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 7 Pro retains a strong position for those valuing Google’s software experience and computational photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 24 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 27 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 155.8 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.13 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2736 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 68mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5, Auracast, ASHA | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 50W wireless, 28% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | MEP-AN00 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
- Potentially superior thermal management due to 3nm process
- Limited availability (China only)
- Camera performance unknown without further testing
- Software ecosystem less mature than Google's
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera processing with Google AI
- Seamless software experience with guaranteed updates
- Globally available with established support network
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 chipset less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright conditions. While the Honor 500 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, Honor typically employs high-quality OLED panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without specific details on the Honor 500 Pro’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), it’s difficult to definitively assess its display quality, but the Pixel 7 Pro sets a high bar for visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but approach image processing differently. The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms to enhance image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the Honor 500 Pro are missing, the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Pixel 7 Pro’s video capabilities are also highly regarded, offering excellent stabilization and color accuracy. Without knowing the Honor 500 Pro’s sensor sizes and lens apertures, a direct comparison is difficult, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s established track record in image processing gives it an edge.
Performance
The Honor 500 Pro’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in mobile silicon. Its octa-core CPU, featuring 2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores, promises substantial performance gains over the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2. The Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm node, utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Oryon cores are also expected to deliver superior single-core performance, benefiting responsiveness and app launch times.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 83 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Honor 500 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging capabilities are a standout feature. With 80W wired charging, it can rapidly replenish the battery, achieving 28% charge in just 15 minutes. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0, takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. Both devices offer 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, but the Honor 500 Pro’s significantly faster wired charging provides a substantial convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 500 Pro (China) if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if rapid charging is a priority. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera processing with Google’s AI enhancements, and a more globally available device with established support.