Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Honor 50: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and incredibly fast charging, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is the clear winner. However, the Honor 50 provides a compelling alternative with a bright display and respectable performance, making it ideal for everyday users who value style and efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 50 | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 16 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 25 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 70% in 20 min, 100% in 45 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Frost Crystal, Amber Red, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Honor Code | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | NTH-AN00, NTH-NX9 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
Honor 50
- Stylish design and build quality
- Bright and vibrant display
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G processor
- Good battery endurance (100h)
- Slower charging speed (45 minutes)
- Less powerful processor than the 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 888 performance
- Incredibly fast 120W charging (17 minutes)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Slightly lower battery endurance (92h)
- Snapdragon 888 can run hot under load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 837 nits, compared to the Honor 50’s 748 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both are excellent, the 11T Pro’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) provide a more immersive viewing experience. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both are expected to have 120Hz panels based on market positioning. The Honor 50’s display, while dimmer, is still very good and will be sufficient for most users, but the 11T Pro has a clear advantage for outdoor use and HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Given the market positioning, the Xiaomi 11T Pro likely features a larger main sensor, potentially with optical image stabilization (OIS), offering better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Honor 50 likely focuses on a more balanced camera experience, prioritizing color accuracy and a pleasing aesthetic. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the 11T Pro’s flagship-level chipset likely provides more advanced image processing capabilities. We can assume both offer video recording capabilities, but the 11T Pro’s processing power may allow for higher resolution or frame rate options.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor 50’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The 888 features the Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the 778G’s Cortex-A78 core at 2.4 GHz. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The 5nm process node of the 888 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though the 888 is known to run hot under sustained load. The Honor 50’s 778G provides excellent performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, but won’t match the 11T Pro’s capabilities. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the 11T Pro’s superior chipset will benefit more from the faster memory.
Battery Life
The Honor 50 has an endurance rating of 100 hours, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro scores 92 hours. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The 11T Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving 100% charge in just 17 minutes, compared to the Honor 50’s 45 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime. While the Honor 50’s battery may last slightly longer on a single charge, the 11T Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any battery life concerns for most users. The 11T Pro also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 50 if you need a stylish phone with a vibrant display and solid all-day battery life, and aren't demanding the absolute highest performance for gaming. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and need the fastest possible charging speeds – even if it means slightly shorter battery endurance.