Honor 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the slightly better all-rounder. Its superior battery endurance (113h vs 100h) and brighter display (800 nits vs 748 nits) provide a more consistently positive user experience, despite the Honor 50’s faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 50 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 25 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 70% in 20 min, 100% in 45 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Frost Crystal, Amber Red, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Honor Code | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | NTH-AN00, NTH-NX9 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 50
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Sleek and modern design (assumed based on brand reputation)
- Potentially more natural image processing
- Lower battery endurance (100h vs 113h)
- Less bright display (748 nits)
- Camera specs are unknown
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Superior battery endurance (113h)
- Brighter display (800 nits)
- More reliable overall experience
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially more saturated image processing
- Design may be less visually striking
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a noticeably brighter display, reaching 800 nits compared to the Honor 50’s 748 nits. This 52-nit difference translates to significantly improved visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED panels, the Galaxy A52s 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both are commonly found at 120Hz in this segment. The brighter display benefits users who consume media outdoors or frequently work in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), a definitive camera comparison is impossible. However, the absence of any mention of a telephoto lens on either device suggests a focus on wide and ultrawide photography. Users seeking significant zoom capabilities will be disappointed. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Samsung typically favoring more saturated colors and Honor leaning towards a more natural look.
Performance
Both the Honor 50 and Galaxy A52s 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable between the two. Thermal management will likely depend on chassis design and software optimization, a factor not detailed in the provided specs. The identical chipset ensures a smooth experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming on both devices.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G holds a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving a measured 113 hours compared to the Honor 50’s 100 hours. This 13-hour difference suggests the A52s 5G will last longer on a single charge under typical usage. However, the Honor 50 compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired, achieving 70% charge in 20 minutes and 100% in 45 minutes, versus the A52s 5G’s 25W charging. This makes the Honor 50 ideal for users who prioritize quick top-ups, while the A52s 5G suits those who prefer longer runtimes between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 50 if you prioritize rapid charging and a sleek design, and frequently find yourself needing to top up your phone quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value longer battery life, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a more consistently reliable overall experience, even if it means slower charging.