The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 400 and Oppo Reno10 Pro represent compelling options. The Honor 400 arrives with a newer chipset and a focus on extended battery life, while the Oppo Reno10 Pro leverages its 80W charging and established camera reputation. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Honor 400 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with a significantly higher battery endurance rating of 56:28h, provides a more reliable experience than the Oppo Reno10 Pro's older Snapdragon 778G and 104h endurance rating (which is likely an older metric).
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 156.5 x 74.6 x 7.3 mm (6.16 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2736 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired (for 5300 mAh), 44% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min
80W wired (for 6000 mAh), 40% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3
Reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh - Europe· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh - ROW | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Meteor Silver, Desert Gold, Tidal Blue | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | DNY-NX9 | CPH2525 |
| Price | € 293.99 / $ 338.80 | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 56:28h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400
- Superior battery endurance (56:28h)
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Charging speed slightly slower than Oppo in initial 15 minutes (66W version)
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- Faster 80W charging
- Potentially better camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Established Reno series features
- Older Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Lower battery endurance rating
- Significantly dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Honor 400 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1550 nits, compared to the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 793 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Honor 400’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use. The Reno10 Pro’s display specifications are not detailed enough to assess color accuracy or panel technology (LTPO or not), but the brightness difference is substantial.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro is marketed with a focus on its camera capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics beyond 'Photo / Video'. Without sensor size, aperture details, or image processing information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Honor 400’s camera specs are also absent. However, given the Reno series’ history, it’s reasonable to expect a strong emphasis on portrait photography and video stabilization. The lack of detail for the Honor 400 makes it hard to assess its camera prowess, but the Reno10 Pro likely holds an advantage in this area based on brand reputation.
Performance
The Honor 400’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture also favors the Honor 400; its Cortex-A715 cores are more efficient than the Reno10 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Honor 400’s configuration suggests a performance edge in both single-core and multi-core tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 offers two battery configurations: 5300 mAh with 66W charging and 6000 mAh with 80W charging. The 66W configuration reaches 44% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes, while the 80W version hits 40% in 15 minutes. The Oppo Reno10 Pro features 80W charging, but its battery capacity is unspecified. Crucially, the Honor 400’s endurance rating of 56:28h significantly surpasses the Reno10 Pro’s 104h (likely an older testing methodology). This suggests the Honor 400’s combination of chipset efficiency and battery capacity delivers substantially longer real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 if you need all-day battery life and a phone that can handle demanding tasks without significant throttling. It’s ideal for users who stream videos, play games, or frequently travel. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a potentially more refined camera experience, and are willing to compromise on overall battery endurance and raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Honor 400 experience throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s 4nm process and improved thermal design should mitigate throttling better than the Snapdragon 778G. While not a flagship chip, it’s designed for sustained performance, and the Honor 400’s larger battery capacity provides more headroom for thermal management during gaming.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Oppo Reno10 Pro compare to the 66W/80W options on the Honor 400 in real-world use?
While the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 80W charging is faster initially, the Honor 400’s larger battery capacity (6000 mAh) means it can still provide a full charge relatively quickly. The difference in charging time is likely to be noticeable in the first 15-20 minutes, but the Honor 400’s larger battery will offer significantly longer usage between charges.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Honor 400 a major concern?
It is a concern. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing capabilities, it’s difficult to assess the Honor 400’s camera performance. However, the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s camera advantage relies on its established reputation, and the Honor 400 could still deliver competitive results.
