The Xiaomi 11T Pro, released with a flagship Snapdragon 888, now faces competition from newer mid-range devices like the Honor 400 Smart. This comparison dissects the trade-offs between an older, more powerful chipset and a modern, efficiency-focused one, examining which phone delivers the best experience for today's user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 11T Pro offers a more compelling package. While the Honor 400 Smart boasts impressive battery endurance, the 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 provides significantly superior processing power, and its 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. The 11T Pro remains a strong contender even in 2024.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 09 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | Tuned by Harman Kardon
24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | LGN-NX1 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | - | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 69:32h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400 Smart
- Exceptional battery endurance (69:32h)
- High charge cycle count (1600)
- Modern Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 chipset
- Slower 35W charging
- Performance significantly lower than flagship alternatives
- Limited display information
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (17 minutes to full)
- High peak display brightness (837 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance (92h)
- Older chipset generation
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 837 nits, a significant advantage over the Honor 400 Smart (brightness data unavailable). While the Honor 400 Smart’s display specs are missing, the 11T Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a vibrant viewing experience. The 11T Pro’s display is likely to be more visible outdoors and offer richer colors. Without knowing the panel type or refresh rate of the Honor 400 Smart, it’s difficult to assess its overall display quality beyond battery impact.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Xiaomi 11T Pro likely benefits from the processing power of the Snapdragon 888 for image processing and potentially more advanced features. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, flagship chipsets generally enable more sophisticated computational photography algorithms, giving the 11T Pro an edge. The absence of detail on the Honor 400 Smart’s camera suggests it’s a more basic implementation.
Performance
The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) is a clear winner in raw processing power compared to the Honor 400 Smart’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm). The 888 features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A78 cores, offering a substantial performance leap over the 400 Smart’s dual Cortex-A78 cores at 2.3 GHz. While the 6nm process of the 6s Gen 3 is more efficient, it cannot compensate for the architectural advantages and higher clock speeds of the 5nm Snapdragon 888. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better multitasking on the 11T Pro.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 Smart claims an impressive 69:32h endurance and 1600 charge cycles, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro offers 92h endurance. However, the 11T Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving 72% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 17 minutes. The 400 Smart’s 35W charging is significantly slower. While the 400 Smart may last longer on a single charge, the 11T Pro’s rapid charging minimizes downtime, making it more convenient for power users. The 11T Pro’s endurance rating, despite being older, is still competitive, suggesting efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 Smart if you prioritize exceptional battery life and are primarily a casual user focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light communication. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you demand faster performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Xiaomi 11T Pro suffer from overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load. However, the Xiaomi 11T Pro incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate this. While some throttling may occur during extended gaming, it's unlikely to be a major issue for most users, and the performance will still be significantly higher than the Honor 400 Smart.
❓ How does the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 in the Honor 400 Smart impact real-world battery life compared to the 5nm Snapdragon 888?
The 6nm process is more power-efficient than 5nm, meaning the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 consumes less power for the same task. However, the Snapdragon 888 is a more powerful chip, and its tasks are completed faster, potentially offsetting some of the efficiency gains. The Honor 400 Smart’s longer endurance rating suggests the efficiency advantage is noticeable in typical usage scenarios.
❓ Is the 120W charging of the Xiaomi 11T Pro safe for the battery's long-term health?
Xiaomi employs multiple safety mechanisms to protect the battery during ultra-fast charging. While fast charging can theoretically contribute to faster battery degradation over years of use, the benefits of reduced downtime often outweigh this concern for most users. The 11T Pro’s charging system is designed to minimize any negative impact on battery health.
