Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Honor 400 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and faster 100W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Xiaomi 13T remains a strong contender, providing excellent value and a solid all-around experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 400 Pro | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.33 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 51% in 15 min, 100% in 39 min 50W wireless 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh - Europe· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh - ROW | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal Blue | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | DNP-NX9 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | $ 569.00 / £ 417.71 / € 549.90 | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 56:27h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price point
- Camera details currently unknown
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent value for money
- Likely strong camera system (based on Xiaomi's reputation)
- Solid overall performance with Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Display Comparison
The Honor 400 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1481 nits, compared to the Xiaomi 13T’s 1264 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display brightness difference is significant for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) are missing for both, but a higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for the Honor 400 Pro, especially for HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the 13T likely emphasizes camera features, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Honor 400 Pro, while potentially capable, may prioritize overall system performance. Without sensor size, aperture, and OIS details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. We can assume both will offer capable cameras, but Xiaomi typically invests heavily in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor 400 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, while the Xiaomi 13T utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4nm) with a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.1 GHz. Despite the slightly higher clock speed of the Dimensity, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s newer architecture and more efficient cores provide a substantial performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration (1x3.0 GHz X4, 5x2.95 GHz A720, 2x2.0 GHz A520) is more balanced than the Dimensity’s (1x3.1 GHz A78, 3x3.0 GHz A78, 4x2.0 GHz A55), suggesting better multi-tasking capabilities. Thermal management will be crucial, but the 4nm process on both should mitigate throttling.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 Pro demonstrates superior battery endurance with a 56:27h rating, while the Xiaomi 13T’s older 101h rating is less directly comparable. More relevant is the active use score: 13:54h for the Honor 400 Pro versus 12:23h for the Xiaomi 13T. The Honor 400 Pro also boasts significantly faster charging – 100W wired (0-100% in 39 minutes) and 50W wireless – compared to the Xiaomi 13T’s 67W wired (0-100% in 42 minutes). The addition of 5W reverse wired and wireless charging on the Honor 400 Pro adds further versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize a balanced experience with a strong camera system and excellent value for money, and don't require the absolute latest chipset.