Honor 400 Pro vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the Honor 400 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers a significant leap in processing power, and the 100W charging is unmatched. However, the Pixel 7 Pro remains a compelling option for those deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem and camera capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 400 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.33 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 51% in 15 min, 100% in 39 min 50W wireless 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh - Europe· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh - ROW | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal Blue | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | DNP-NX9 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | $ 569.00 / £ 417.71 / € 549.90 | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 56:27h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Battery endurance rating is lower than Pixel 7 Pro (though active use is competitive)
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography
- Smooth and refined software experience
- Seamless integration with Google services
- Slower charging speed (23W)
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Honor 400 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1481 nits compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s 1090 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Honor 400 Pro provides a more vibrant and dynamic viewing experience. We lack PWM frequency data for the Honor 400 Pro, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s display is known for its smooth scrolling and accurate color reproduction. The Honor’s brightness advantage is particularly beneficial for HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but approach photography differently. The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s software algorithms to produce stunning images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the Honor 400 Pro are unavailable, the Pixel 7 Pro’s strengths lie in its image processing pipeline, delivering consistent results across various scenarios. The Pixel 7 Pro excels in both photo and video capture, offering features like Magic Eraser and Cinematic Blur. Without detailed sensor information for the Honor 400 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s established reputation in computational photography gives it an edge.
Performance
The Honor 400 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s octa-core configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 – offers a more modern and efficient architecture. The Tensor G2, with its 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. This means the Honor 400 Pro will excel in graphically intensive tasks like gaming and video editing, while the Pixel 7 Pro shines in features like voice recognition and image processing. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 Pro demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving a measured 56:27h endurance rating compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s 83h (note: this is an older rating and likely doesn't reflect real-world usage as accurately). However, the Honor 400 Pro’s active use score of 13:54h is more relevant for power users. The real differentiator is charging speed: the Honor 400 Pro supports 100W wired charging, reaching 51% in 15 minutes and 100% in just 39 minutes, a massive improvement over the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Honor 400 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features mirrored by the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wireless charging and reverse wired/wireless capabilities. The Honor’s faster charging mitigates any concerns about its potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming or demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging. You'll benefit from a brighter display and a more powerful processor. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prioritize a refined software experience, exceptional computational photography, and seamless integration with Google services. It's the better choice for everyday users who value camera quality and software polish over peak performance.