The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 400 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A54 represent compelling options. While both aim for a similar price bracket, they take distinctly different approaches. The Honor 400 Lite prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 focuses on a brighter display and established brand recognition. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Honor 400 Lite is the clear winner. Its astounding 48:56h battery endurance significantly outpaces the Galaxy A54’s 119h rating, making it ideal for heavy users. However, Samsung’s brighter display and more refined software experience may appeal to those willing to compromise on battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 03 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.6 x 7.3 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, 3500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Marrs Green, Velvet Black, Velvet Grey | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | ABR-NX1, ABR-N31C1 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | € 199.90 / $ 308.03 / £ 169.00 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 48:56h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (48:56h endurance)
- Faster 35W charging
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1400 cycles)
- Likely less vibrant display (LCD vs AMOLED)
- Less established brand reputation
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter display (980 nits)
- More refined software experience
- Stronger brand recognition and support
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 980 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, where the Honor 400 Lite’s brightness remains unspecified. While the A54’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite (nominal)’ – typical for AMOLED – the Honor 400 Lite’s panel type isn’t detailed, suggesting it’s likely an LCD. This difference impacts color vibrancy and black levels. The A54’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised with ‘Photo / Video’ capabilities, but detailed camera specs are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the A54 likely features a more sophisticated camera system with better image processing. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A54, which is not mentioned for the Honor 400 Lite, would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording. Avoid placing too much weight on the likely inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices, as these typically offer limited real-world benefit.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration (4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55), but the underlying chipsets differ. The Samsung Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380, fabricated on a 5nm process, generally offers better efficiency than the Honor 400 Lite’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6nm). However, the Dimensity 7025 Ultra features slightly higher clocked Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), potentially offering a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The 5nm process of the Exynos should translate to better thermal management under sustained load, reducing throttling. The Honor 400 Lite’s chipset is newer, but the process node difference is a key consideration.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 Lite dominates in battery endurance, achieving an astonishing 48:56h rating. This is dramatically higher than the Samsung Galaxy A54’s 119h (equivalent to roughly 24:30h of real-world use). While the A54 supports 25W charging, the Honor 400 Lite offers 35W wired charging, promising faster top-ups. The Honor 400 Lite also claims 1400 battery cycles, suggesting superior long-term battery health compared to the A54, which doesn’t specify cycle count. The difference in endurance is the defining characteristic of these two phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 Lite if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a charger. It’s the perfect companion for travelers or anyone who dislikes daily charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prioritize a vibrant, easily visible display, a more polished software experience, and the peace of mind that comes with a well-established brand. It’s better suited for users who value multimedia consumption and camera versatility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1380 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, particularly in demanding games. The 5nm process helps mitigate this, but users may experience frame drops after extended gaming. The Honor 400 Lite's Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while on a slightly larger node, may perform similarly or even better in sustained tasks due to its higher clocked cores.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for detailed close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range offer limited image quality. They often lack the detail and clarity needed for truly impressive close-up photography. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-level results. The Galaxy A54's potentially superior image processing might yield slightly better macro shots, but the difference will likely be minimal.
❓ Can the Honor 400 Lite realistically last two full days on a single charge with typical usage?
The Honor 400 Lite's 48:56h endurance rating suggests it can absolutely last two full days for many users with typical usage patterns (social media, messaging, some video streaming). However, heavy gaming or prolonged video recording will naturally reduce battery life. The key is that it offers a significant buffer compared to the Galaxy A54.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A54 support 90fps gameplay in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 can achieve high frame rates in PUBG Mobile, but consistently maintaining 90fps will depend on the graphics settings and the specific device configuration. Expect to need to lower graphics settings to achieve a stable 90fps experience. The Honor 400 Lite's gaming performance is less well-documented, but the Dimensity 7025 Ultra should be capable of similar frame rates with comparable settings.
