The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 400 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A34 represent compelling options. The A34 has been a mainstay, while the 400 Lite arrives with a focus on longevity. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing battery life above all else, the Honor 400 Lite is the clear winner, offering nearly 49 hours of endurance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A34 counters with a significantly brighter display, making it the better choice for outdoor visibility and media consumption.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 03 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.6 x 7.3 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, 3500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5230 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Marrs Green, Velvet Black, Velvet Grey | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | ABR-NX1, ABR-N31C1 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | € 199.90 / $ 308.03 / £ 169.00 | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 48:56h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor 400 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (48:56h endurance)
- Faster 35W wired charging
- High battery cycle count (1400 cycles)
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially inferior to A34
- Camera details are lacking, making quality assessment difficult
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Bright 1009 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Established Samsung ecosystem and software support
- Potentially faster CPU clock speed
- Significantly shorter battery life (133h endurance)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Lower battery cycle count (not specified)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a considerable advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1009 nits. While the Honor 400 Lite’s display specs are not provided, this difference is substantial, impacting outdoor usability. The A34’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a VA panel, offering deep blacks, while the Honor’s panel type remains unknown. The lack of refresh rate information for the Honor 400 Lite is a notable omission, potentially placing it at a disadvantage against the A34’s likely 90Hz or 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality. The image processing style will likely differ between the two brands, with Samsung typically favoring more saturated colors and the Honor potentially aiming for a more natural look. The A34’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, but this is speculative without concrete data.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Galaxy A34’s Dimensity 1080 (2.6 GHz Cortex-A78) has a slight clock speed advantage over the Honor 400 Lite’s Dimensity 7025 Ultra (2.5 GHz Cortex-A78). This difference, however, is likely marginal in real-world performance. Both CPUs share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The Honor 400 Lite’s chipset is newer, potentially offering improved efficiency, but the A34’s higher clock speed could translate to slightly faster app loading and responsiveness. RAM speed and storage type (UFS 2.2 vs UFS 3.1) are unknown for both devices, impacting overall system performance.
Battery Life
The Honor 400 Lite dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 48 hours and 56 minutes on a single charge. This is a significant leap over the Samsung Galaxy A34’s 133-hour rating. The Honor also boasts 1400 charge cycles, indicating superior long-term battery health. However, the A34’s 25W charging is slower than the Honor 400 Lite’s 35W wired charging, meaning the Honor will likely reach 100% faster, despite its smaller battery capacity (not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 400 Lite if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value long-term battery health with its 1400 charge cycles. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A34 if you prioritize a vibrant, bright display for streaming and gaming, and prefer the established Samsung ecosystem and software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7025 Ultra in the Honor 400 Lite throttle under sustained load, like gaming?
While the 6nm process suggests good thermal efficiency, the Honor 400 Lite’s thermal management capabilities are unknown. The Dimensity 7025 Ultra is a capable chipset, but prolonged gaming sessions could lead to some performance throttling. The A34's Dimensity 1080 may experience similar throttling, but without detailed thermal testing, it's difficult to say which handles heat better.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for detailed close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget and mid-range phones offer limited detail and image quality. They are often included for marketing purposes but rarely deliver impressive results. Expect soft images with limited dynamic range. Dedicated smartphone cameras with larger sensors and better processing are far superior for macro photography.
❓ What type of display technology does the Honor 400 Lite use, and does it support high refresh rates?
Unfortunately, the display technology (IPS, AMOLED, etc.) and refresh rate of the Honor 400 Lite are not specified. This is a significant omission, as it impacts the overall viewing experience. The Samsung Galaxy A34 likely features a Super AMOLED panel with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smoother scrolling.
