Honor's latest offerings, the 300 and 80 Pro Flat, present a compelling choice for consumers. The 300 arrives with the newer Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the 80 Pro Flat leverages the established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, alongside their respective strengths in charging, to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and gaming, the Honor 80 Pro Flat with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is the superior choice. While the Honor 300’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers efficiency gains, the 8+ Gen 1’s more powerful CPU and GPU provide a noticeable edge in demanding tasks. However, the 300’s faster 100W charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 02 | 2023, January 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 186 g or 193 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~436 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 53% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green, Purple, Gray | Black, Green, Pink |
| Models | AMM-AN00 | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 450 EUR |
Honor 300
- Significantly faster 100W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the 8+ Gen 1
- Likely less capable camera system
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- More powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Likely better camera system with OIS
- Slower 66W charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are absent from the provided data. However, given the 'Flat' designation of the 80 Pro, it's reasonable to assume a flat AMOLED panel, potentially with a high refresh rate. The Honor 300’s display characteristics are unknown, but a modern AMOLED panel is expected. The key differentiator will likely be peak brightness and color accuracy, with the 80 Pro potentially benefiting from the flagship positioning. Without specific data, it's difficult to assess PWM dimming rates or HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, making a direct comparison impossible. However, the 80 Pro Flat, being a 'Pro' model, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The 7 Gen 3’s ISP is capable, but the 8+ Gen 1’s ISP, coupled with a potentially superior sensor array, will likely result in better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can expect the 80 Pro Flat to offer more versatile zoom capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 80 Pro Flat’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This configuration delivers significantly higher peak performance than the Honor 300’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm). The 7 Gen 3 utilizes a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. While the 7 Gen 3 benefits from architectural improvements and a 4nm process, the 8+ Gen 1’s more powerful core arrangement translates to superior CPU and GPU performance. The 8+ Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU will outperform the 7 Gen 3’s Adreno 644, especially in graphically intensive games. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the 8+ Gen 1’s superior processing power will better leverage its bandwidth.
Battery Life
Battery capacities are not provided. However, the charging speeds are a clear differentiator. The Honor 300 boasts 100W wired charging, capable of reaching 53% charge in 15 minutes. The Honor 80 Pro Flat offers 66W wired charging, achieving 3-50% in the same timeframe. While the 80 Pro Flat’s charging isn’t slow, the 300’s 100W charging provides a significantly faster top-up. Both devices offer 5W reverse wired charging, a convenience feature for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 300 if you prioritize rapid charging speeds and efficient daily use, and are less concerned with pushing the absolute limits of mobile gaming. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is well-suited for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Honor 80 Pro Flat if you demand consistent high performance for gaming, content creation, or multitasking, and are willing to trade slightly slower charging for a more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 80 Pro Flat experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. However, Honor's thermal management implementation will be crucial. The 8+ Gen 1's 4nm process and efficient design mitigate throttling compared to older flagship chips, but demanding games may still lead to some performance reduction over extended periods. Reviewers will need to assess the 80 Pro Flat’s cooling solution to determine the extent of throttling.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Honor 300 powerful enough for demanding mobile games like Genshin Impact or PUBG?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is capable of running demanding games, but you'll likely need to adjust graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. While it won't match the performance of the 8+ Gen 1, it can provide a playable experience with optimized settings. Expect to prioritize frame rate stability over maximum visual fidelity.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Honor 300 compare to other fast charging solutions on the market?
100W charging is exceptionally fast, placing the Honor 300 among the quickest-charging smartphones available. It significantly reduces charging times compared to 66W or 44W solutions, allowing for a substantial charge in just 15-20 minutes. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves with low battery levels.
