Honor 300 Ultra vs. Huawei Pura 70 Pro+: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Honor 300 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant advantage in processing power and thermal efficiency compared to the 7nm Kirin 9010. However, the Pura 70 Pro+ offers a compelling alternative for those deeply invested in the Huawei ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 300 Ultra | Huawei Pura 70 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 02 | 2024, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 07 | Available. Released 2024, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, aluminum frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.3 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Giant rhino glass | Kunlun Glass (Xuanwu tempered) |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1260 x 2844 pixels (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, HDR, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.18 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Kirin 9010 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | - |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.8x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-4.0, 25mm (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 93mm (telephoto), PDAF (5cm - ∞), OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 12.5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | Yes, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 59% in 15 min 80W wireless, 39% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, White, Silver |
| Models | - | HBN-AL10, HBN-AL80 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 1050 EUR |
Honor 300 Ultra
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Faster reverse wireless charging options
- May lack the unique software features of Huawei’s ecosystem
- Camera image processing may be less distinctive
Huawei Pura 70 Pro+
- Potentially superior camera image processing and larger sensor
- Unique design and Huawei ecosystem integration
- Faster reverse wired charging
- Kirin 9010 chipset is less powerful and efficient
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high-quality OLED displays, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rates are currently unavailable. However, given Honor’s recent track record, the 300 Ultra likely employs an LTPO panel for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering better power efficiency. The Pura 70 Pro+’s display quality will likely focus on color accuracy and Huawei’s proprietary display technologies. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but a direct comparison requires hands-on testing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the Pura 70 Pro+ is expected to feature a larger main sensor, potentially exceeding the 50MP mark, leveraging Huawei’s expertise in computational photography. The Honor 300 Ultra will likely focus on a balanced camera system, utilizing Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. Both devices offer OIS, but the effectiveness will depend on the specific implementation. The 2MP macro cameras often found on both brands are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit. Image processing style will be a key differentiator – Huawei typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 300 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture – Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.0 GHz, Cortex-A720 performance cores at 2.95 GHz, and Cortex-A520 efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz – compared to the Huawei Pura 70 Pro+'s Kirin 9010 (7nm). The 4nm process of the Snapdragon translates to better thermal management and power efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Kirin 9010’s Taishan cores, while powerful, are less efficient. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also benefits from Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU, offering superior graphics performance. Both devices will likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s overall system-on-chip advantage is substantial.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 100W wired charging, promising rapid replenishment. The Honor 300 Ultra claims 59% charge in 15 minutes, while the Pura 70 Pro+ achieves full charge in a similar timeframe. Wireless charging is also competitive at 80W for both, with the Honor reaching 39% in 15 minutes. The Honor 300 Ultra offers both 5W reverse wired and reverse wireless charging, while the Pura 70 Pro+ provides 20W reverse wired and 18W reverse wireless. The slightly faster reverse charging on the Huawei is a minor advantage. Battery capacity is currently unknown for both, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Honor 300 Ultra.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 300 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the broader Android ecosystem. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a clear edge in CPU and GPU capabilities. Buy the Huawei Pura 70 Pro+ if you prioritize a unique design aesthetic, are heavily invested in Huawei’s services, and prefer a potentially more refined camera image processing style, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.