Honor 300 Pro vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 300 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming, and its significantly faster 100W wired and 80W wireless charging capabilities provide a substantial convenience advantage. While the Xiaomi 12 Pro remains a capable device, it's outpaced by the newer hardware.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 300 Pro | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 02 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 07 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.3 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 59% in 15 min 80W wireless, 39% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Gray, Blue |
| Models | AMP-AN00 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Honor 300 Pro
- Significantly faster charging speeds (100W wired, 80W wireless)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Likely improved thermal management
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
- Software experience may vary (Honor UI)
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Capable Dimensity 9000+ performance
- PD3.0 and QC4 fast charging support
- Potentially lower price point
- Established Xiaomi software ecosystem
- Slower charging speeds compared to Honor 300 Pro
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize a 4nm process, the display specifications aren't provided. However, given the Honor 300 Pro's flagship positioning, it likely features an LTPO panel for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering better power efficiency compared to a standard AMOLED panel on the Xiaomi 12 Pro. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but Honor often prioritizes screen-to-body ratio in its Pro models. Color accuracy is likely excellent on both, but the Honor 300 Pro may benefit from newer color calibration techniques.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems. The Honor 300 Pro, being a newer device, likely benefits from advancements in image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ ISP is capable, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP in the Honor 300 Pro offers improved noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Honor 300 Pro likely has an edge in image quality due to its newer processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 300 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offering a significant architectural advantage over the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ and its Cortex-X2 core at 3.20 GHz. While the Dimensity 9000+ boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its prime core, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s newer architecture and improved efficiency translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s combination of Cortex-A720 and A520 cores also provides a more balanced performance profile than the Dimensity 9000+'s A710 and A510 cores. The Honor 300 Pro will likely exhibit less throttling under prolonged heavy loads.
Battery Life
The Honor 300 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 100W wired charging can reportedly add 59% charge in just 15 minutes, and the 80W wireless charging adds 39% in the same timeframe. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0 and QC4, is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Honor 300 Pro’s faster charging mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery. The inclusion of 5W reverse wired and wireless charging on the Honor 300 Pro adds further convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 300 Pro if you prioritize peak performance for gaming, content creation, or demanding applications, and if rapid charging – both wired and wireless – is a key requirement. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you're seeking a still-capable flagship experience at a potentially lower price point, and aren't as concerned with having the absolute latest processor or fastest charging speeds. The Xiaomi 12 Pro represents a strong value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.