Honor 300 Pro vs OnePlus 10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 300 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, alongside faster charging speeds – both wired and wireless. While the OnePlus 10 Pro offers a solid experience, the Honor 300 Pro represents a substantial upgrade in core performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 300 Pro | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 02 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 07 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.3 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 59% in 15 min 80W wireless, 39% in 15 min 5W reverse wired Reverse wireless | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | AMP-AN00 | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 300 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Likely improved thermal management
- More future-proofed chipset
- Detailed camera specs currently unknown
- Display specs not fully available
OnePlus 10 Pro
- Solid battery life (107h endurance)
- Well-regarded camera system
- Potentially lower price point
- Mature software experience
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Slower charging speeds
- Prone to thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts a display capable of 780 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure, but the Honor 300 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable. Given Honor’s recent focus on display quality, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable or superior brightness level. Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. Without PWM frequency data for the Honor 300 Pro, it’s impossible to assess potential differences in flicker-related eye strain, a crucial factor for sensitive users. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s display is known for its color accuracy, and the Honor 300 Pro will need to match or exceed this to compete effectively.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications for the Honor 300 Pro are currently lacking. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s camera system is well-regarded, but its performance is heavily reliant on software processing. The Honor 300 Pro’s image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. Without knowing sensor sizes or lens apertures, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the newer ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 will likely provide improved noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the 8 Gen 1 in the OnePlus 10 Pro.
Performance
The Honor 300 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant architectural upgrade over the OnePlus 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 3 features a new Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, compared to the 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 at 3.0 GHz. More importantly, the 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-A720 performance cores are substantially more efficient and powerful than the 8 Gen 1’s A710 cores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Honor 300 Pro’s newer process node (4nm vs 4nm) also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The OnePlus 10 Pro, while still capable, will struggle to match the sustained performance of the Honor 300 Pro.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10 Pro has an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Honor 300 Pro’s charging capabilities are a major advantage. With 100W wired charging, it can reach 59% charge in just 15 minutes, significantly faster than the OnePlus 10 Pro’s 65W (North America) or 80W (International) charging, which takes 32 minutes for a full charge. The Honor 300 Pro also supports 80W wireless charging, achieving 39% charge in 15 minutes, outpacing the OnePlus 10 Pro’s 50W wireless charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the Honor 300 Pro, the faster charging speeds mitigate concerns about a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 300 Pro if you prioritize raw performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible charging. You'll benefit from the latest processor technology and a more future-proofed device. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you're seeking a well-rounded flagship experience at a potentially lower price point, and aren't as concerned with having the absolute latest chipset. It remains a capable device for everyday use and photography.