Realme X50 Pro 5G vs Honor 30 Pro: Which 5G Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers superior overall performance, coupled with significantly faster 65W charging. While the Honor 30 Pro offers a respectable experience, the Realme’s performance edge and charging speed justify its slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor 30 Pro | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, April 21 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (Periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@1920fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Icelandic Frost, Neon purple | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | EBG-AN00 | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 670 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor 30 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 865 processor
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Likely brighter display (635 nits)
- Potentially smoother display (if higher refresh rate)
- Camera details are lacking
- Software experience may be less refined than Honor
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Balanced performance from Kirin 990 5G
- Good battery endurance (90h rating)
- Potentially better integration with Huawei ecosystem
- 40W fast charging
- Slower processor compared to Snapdragon 865
- Slower charging speed (40W vs 65W)
- Display brightness data unavailable
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, providing a visibly brighter experience in direct sunlight compared to the Honor 30 Pro (brightness data unavailable). Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. While both likely utilize similar AMOLED technology, the Realme’s higher peak brightness gives it an edge for outdoor visibility. The absence of refresh rate data for the Honor 30 Pro means the Realme X50 Pro 5G likely has a smoother experience if it supports a higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the camera experience will likely differ due to image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Realme X50 Pro 5G, given Realme’s focus on camera improvements in subsequent models, likely benefits from more refined software processing. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) utilizes a single Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, alongside three additional A77 cores at 2.42 GHz, offering a significant architectural advantage over the Honor 30 Pro’s Kirin 990 5G. The Kirin 990 5G employs two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.86 GHz and two more at 2.36 GHz. While clock speeds are comparable, the newer Cortex-A77 architecture in the Snapdragon 865 provides superior instructions-per-clock (IPC), translating to faster real-world performance. This difference is particularly noticeable in graphically intensive tasks and gaming. Both utilize 7nm+ fabrication, but Qualcomm’s optimization generally leads to better sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Honor 30 Pro’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The Honor 30 Pro’s 40W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower. This charging speed difference is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Realme’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 30 Pro if you prioritize a balanced experience and are heavily invested in the Huawei/Honor ecosystem. Its Kirin 990 5G offers good performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and the 40W charging is adequate. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games and applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 65W charging. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.