Honor 30 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?

Launched in a competitive 2020 flagship market, the Honor 30 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Pro represent distinct approaches to high-end smartphone design. The Honor 30 Pro leverages Huawei’s Kirin 990 5G chipset, while the Oppo Find X2 Pro opts for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, camera capabilities, and battery life to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Oppo Find X2 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset and 65W SuperVOOC charging provide a noticeable edge, despite the Honor 30 Pro offering a competitive feature set at potentially a lower price point.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor 30 Pro Oppo Find X2 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2020, April 15. Released 2020, April 212020, March 06
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2020, March 06
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions160.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.90 x 0.33 in)165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz)
 IP54, dust and water resistantIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density)
Size6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeOLEDAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetKirin 990 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
GPUMali-G76 MP16Adreno 650
OSAndroid 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play ServicesAndroid 10, ColorOS 7.1
Memory
Card slotNano Memory (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFSUFS 3.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (Periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens-
Triple-48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@1920fps; gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR
Selfie camera
Dual32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)-
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single-32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging40W wired 5W reverse wired65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsTitanium silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Icelandic Frost, Neon purpleBlack, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition
ModelsEBG-AN00CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01
PriceAbout 670 EURAbout 300 EUR
Tests
Battery life-Endurance rating 88h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Honor 30 Pro

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Competitive 5G connectivity
  • Solid overall feature set

  • Kirin 990 5G chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 865
  • Slower charging speeds (40W vs 65W)

Oppo Find X2 Pro

  • Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
  • Incredibly fast 65W SuperVOOC charging
  • Brighter and higher contrast display

  • Likely higher initial price
  • May not offer significant camera improvements over the Honor 30 Pro

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 871 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Honor 30 Pro (brightness data unavailable). Both devices utilize 7nm+ chipsets, but the Find X2 Pro’s display also features an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, likely due to its OLED panel, contributing to deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. While both likely employ high refresh rate panels (market standard for flagships of this era), the Find X2 Pro’s superior brightness and contrast give it a clear advantage for multimedia consumption.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are marketed as having strong photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s reputation suggests a focus on natural color reproduction and dynamic range, while Honor’s image processing often leans towards more saturated colors. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it hard to assess low-light performance. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary lenses (like 2MP macros), the primary camera sensor and image processing pipeline are the key differentiators, favoring the Oppo based on brand reputation.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor 30 Pro’s Kirin 990 5G and the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s Snapdragon 865 5G. While both are 7nm+ fabrications, the Snapdragon 865 utilizes newer Cortex-A77 cores (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz) in its prime cluster, offering a slight architectural advantage over the Kirin 990’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.86 GHz & 2x2.36 GHz). This translates to potentially better single-core performance on the Oppo. Both share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (4x1.80 GHz/1.95 GHz), but the Snapdragon 865’s Adreno 650 GPU is generally considered more powerful than the Kirin 990’s Mali-G76 MP16, making the Oppo the better choice for graphically intensive gaming.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (data unavailable for Honor 30 Pro). However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. The Honor 30 Pro’s 40W wired charging is respectable, but significantly slower. The Oppo also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories, which the Honor 30 Pro also provides, but at the same wattage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor 30 Pro if you need a capable 5G phone with a solid camera system and are seeking value for money, potentially finding it at a discounted price due to its age. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize peak performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – a crucial benefit for power users who need to minimize downtime.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 990 5G in the Honor 30 Pro suffer from significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Kirin 990 5G is a capable chipset, it is known to be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load compared to the Snapdragon 865. This means that performance may decrease over time during long gaming sessions as the phone heats up. The Oppo Find X2 Pro, with its Snapdragon 865, generally manages heat more effectively.
❓ How does the 65W SuperVOOC charging on the Oppo Find X2 Pro impact long-term battery health?
Qualcomm's SuperVOOC charging technology incorporates several safety mechanisms to minimize the impact on battery health. While fast charging can generate more heat, Oppo's implementation includes optimized charging algorithms and temperature control to prevent overcharging and degradation. However, all batteries degrade over time, and frequent use of extremely fast charging *may* slightly accelerate this process compared to slower charging methods.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs (sensor size, OIS) a major drawback when comparing these two phones?
Yes, the absence of specific camera details makes a precise comparison difficult. Sensor size is a crucial factor in low-light performance, and OIS significantly improves image stability. Without this information, we rely on brand reputation and general expectations for flagship phones, giving the Oppo Find X2 Pro a slight edge due to its established camera quality.