The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor 200 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking premium features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their core components – from chipsets and displays to charging speeds and battery life – to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, combined with a strong 10:38h active use battery score, provides a significant advantage over the Honor 200.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 27 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.6 x 7.7 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~436 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 4000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 57% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Coral Pink, Moonlight White, Emerald Green, Black | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | ELI-AN00, ELI-NX9 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | $ 402.68 / £ 381.69 / € 289.99 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Honor 200
- Potentially more efficient chipset (Snapdragon 7 Gen 3)
- Honor ecosystem integration
- 100W fast charging
- Unknown display brightness
- Limited battery life data
- Camera specs currently unavailable
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 120W ultra-fast charging (19 minutes to 100%)
- Bright 1283 nit display
- Excellent 10:38h active use battery life
- Potentially higher power consumption
- Dimensity 7200 Ultra may throttle under sustained load
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Honor 200 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially for outdoor photography and video consumption. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely employs a higher-quality panel to achieve this brightness, potentially with better color accuracy, though detailed color calibration data is absent. The Honor 200’s display specifications are currently unknown, making a definitive comparison challenging.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Honor 200, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (details unavailable), benefiting from the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s capable image signal processor. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s image processing algorithms are likely tuned for vibrant colors and strong dynamic range, appealing to social media users. The Honor 200’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size, aperture, and software optimization, areas where Xiaomi has historically excelled in this price segment.
Performance
Both devices employ 4nm chipsets, but their architectures differ. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra with a dual-core Cortex-A715 configuration clocked at 2.8 GHz, potentially offering a slight edge in peak CPU performance compared to the Honor 200’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, which features a single 2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 core and four additional 2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 cores. However, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s more efficient core configuration (including three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 cores) may translate to better sustained performance and thermal management during prolonged gaming sessions. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s six Cortex-A510 cores at 2.0 GHz could consume more power under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines with its 120W wired charging, fully replenishing the battery in just 19 minutes – a significant advantage for users constantly on the go. The Honor 200’s 100W charging, while still fast, takes 15 minutes to reach 57% charge, indicating a slower overall 0-100% time. Crucially, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving 10:38h of active use, suggesting a well-optimized power management system. The Honor 200’s battery capacity and active use score are currently unknown, making a direct comparison difficult.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 200 if you prioritize a streamlined user experience within the Honor ecosystem and value a slightly more efficient chipset in terms of power consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a longer-lasting battery for intensive daily use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a capable chipset, its six Cortex-A510 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz could lead to increased heat generation under sustained load. However, Xiaomi typically implements effective thermal management solutions, including vapor chamber cooling, to mitigate throttling. Real-world gaming performance will depend on the specific game and ambient temperature.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Honor 200 compare to the 120W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ in terms of actual charging time?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W charging is demonstrably faster, achieving a full charge in 19 minutes. The Honor 200’s 100W charging reaches 57% in 15 minutes, implying a longer overall 0-100% charging time. This difference is significant for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Honor 200 a major concern for potential buyers?
Yes, the absence of information regarding the Honor 200’s camera sensor size, aperture, and image processing capabilities makes it difficult to assess its photographic performance. Given Xiaomi’s strong track record in mobile photography, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ holds an advantage in this area until more details about the Honor 200’s camera are revealed.
