The Honor 200 Smart and Xiaomi 14T Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Honor focuses on efficiency with a Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro aims for outright performance with the flagship-class Dimensity 9300+. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Honor 200 Smart’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and 35W charging. However, the Honor 200 Smart offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 17 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 23 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g or 193 g (6.74 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 850 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min
50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Forest Green | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | ALT-NX1 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | € 109.99 / £ 114.99 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Honor 200 Smart
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
- Sufficient performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed (35W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Dimensity 9300+
- Likely a less vibrant and dimmer display
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Flagship-level performance with the Dimensity 9300+
- Brighter and potentially higher refresh rate display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life due to the more powerful processor
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Honor 200 Smart’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Xiaomi’s brightness advantage is crucial for outdoor use. Furthermore, the Xiaomi 14T Pro likely utilizes a higher refresh rate panel, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent from the provided Honor 200 Smart specs. The Xiaomi’s superior display tech caters to users who consume a lot of media outdoors or enjoy visually intensive games.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Honor 200 Smart, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Dimensity 9300+ for enhanced image processing. The Xiaomi’s camera system likely includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), crucial for sharp photos and stable videos, especially in low-light conditions. While the Honor 200 Smart may offer a decent camera for casual use, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is geared towards users who prioritize image quality and versatility.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, representing a significant leap in processing power compared to the Honor 200 Smart’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 9300+’s architecture, with its high-clocked X4 cores, translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The 4nm process node shared by both chipsets contributes to efficiency, but the Dimensity’s superior core configuration provides a clear advantage. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is the choice for power users and gamers.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 120W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 19 minutes, a massive time saving compared to the Honor 200 Smart’s 35W charging. The Xiaomi also supports 50W wireless charging, adding further convenience. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h is impressive, the Honor 200 Smart’s battery life is unknown. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency may allow it to achieve comparable endurance despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor 200 Smart if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize battery efficiency over peak power. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand a smoother experience for demanding apps, gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery life between charges.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ chipset generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chip, Mediatek has made significant strides in thermal management. The 4nm process node helps mitigate heat, and the Xiaomi 14T Pro likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions. However, some heat generation is expected during extended gaming, but it shouldn't lead to significant throttling.
❓ Is the 35W charging on the Honor 200 Smart slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
35W charging is adequate for overnight charging, but it’s considerably slower than the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over an hour, making it less convenient for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor 200 Smart handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 9300+?
The Dimensity 9300+’s superior core configuration and processing power will result in a noticeably smoother multitasking experience. The Honor 200 Smart will handle basic multitasking adequately, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro will be able to manage more demanding apps and heavier workloads without slowdowns.
