HMD 130 Music vs. Samsung E1200 Pusha: A Generational Leap in Mobile Technology

The HMD 130 Music and Samsung E1200 Pusha represent vastly different eras of mobile technology. The Pusha, a relic of the early 2000s, embodies simplicity and durability, while the HMD 130 Music, despite its budget positioning, brings modern smartphone functionality to a wider audience. This comparison isn't about finding a 'better' phone in the traditional sense, but understanding the trade-offs between basic communication and contemporary features.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the vast majority of users, the HMD 130 Music is the clear choice. Its Unisoc 6531F chipset delivers a significantly more versatile experience, enabling music playback, basic apps, and future-proofing against increasingly demanding network standards. The Samsung E1200 Pusha remains viable only for those prioritizing extreme simplicity and longevity above all else.

PHONES
Phone Names HMD 130 Music Samsung E1200 Pusha
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800GSM 900 / 1800
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced2025, March 022012. Released 2012
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, MarchDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions130.5 x 52.9 x 14.8 mm (5.14 x 2.08 x 0.58 in)108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in)
SIMDual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by)Mini-SIM
Weight83.1 g (2.93 oz)65.1 g (2.29 oz)
Display
Resolution240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density)128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density)
Size2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~25.8% screen-to-body ratio)1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTN TFTTFT, 65K colors
Platform
CPU-156 MHz
ChipsetUnisoc 6531F-
Memory
Call recordsYesYes
Card slotmicroSDHCNo
Internal8MB 8MB RAM-
PhonebookYesYes
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DPNo
NFCNo-
PositioningNoNo
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 1.1Proprietary
WLANNoNo
Features
GamesYesNo
JavaNoNo
MessagingSMSSMS
SensorsNo-
Battery
Stand-by-Up to 720 h
Talk time-Up to 7 h
Type2500 mAh, removableRemovable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsDark Blue, Purple, GrayBlack, White, Blue
Price-About 20 EUR
SAR EU-0.81 W/kg (head)
Camera
 -No

HMD 130 Music

  • Modern chipset enables music playback and apps
  • Color display offers a more engaging experience
  • Potential for future software updates and feature additions

  • Battery life is significantly shorter than the Samsung E1200 Pusha
  • Build quality may not be as robust as the older model

Samsung E1200 Pusha

  • Exceptional battery life (weeks on a single charge)
  • Extreme durability and simplicity
  • Very low cost

  • Limited functionality – primarily for calls and texts
  • Outdated technology with no future support
  • Lack of modern features like music playback or a color display

Display Comparison

Details regarding the displays of both devices are unavailable. However, given the market segment, the Samsung E1200 Pusha likely features a small, low-resolution monochrome or basic color LCD. The HMD 130 Music, being a more modern device, almost certainly has a color display, though its resolution and panel technology are likely basic. The HMD 130 Music's display, even if low-resolution, will offer a more visually engaging experience due to its color capabilities.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are unavailable for both devices. It's highly probable the Samsung E1200 Pusha lacks a camera entirely. The HMD 130 Music may include a very basic camera, but image quality will be limited by the chipset's processing capabilities and sensor quality. The presence of *any* camera, however rudimentary, gives the HMD 130 Music an advantage.

Performance

The performance disparity is immense. The Samsung E1200 Pusha's 156 MHz CPU is a product of its time, capable of handling only basic call functions and SMS messaging. In contrast, the HMD 130 Music's Unisoc 6531F chipset, while entry-level, is a modern ARM-based processor capable of running a full operating system (likely a feature phone OS) and supporting applications like music players, FM radio, and potentially even basic internet browsing. The Unisoc 6531F's architecture allows for significantly more complex tasks and better responsiveness.

Battery Life

The Samsung E1200 Pusha is renowned for its exceptional battery life, potentially lasting weeks on a single charge due to its minimal power consumption. The HMD 130 Music, with its more powerful chipset and color display, will have a significantly shorter battery life, likely measured in days rather than weeks. However, the HMD 130 Music's battery life is still likely sufficient for several days of typical use, and the convenience of modern features outweighs the longevity advantage for many users.

Buying Guide

Buy the HMD 130 Music if you need a device capable of playing music, running basic applications like a radio, and offering a degree of future compatibility with evolving mobile networks. Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you prioritize an exceptionally long battery life, absolute simplicity, and a phone that can withstand significant physical abuse without concern for data loss or complex settings.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Unisoc 6531F chipset capable of running any apps beyond basic functions?
Yes, the Unisoc 6531F is capable of running basic Java-based applications and potentially lightweight Android Go apps, depending on the HMD 130 Music's software implementation. This allows for features like FM radio, simple games, and potentially basic social media access.
❓ How does the build quality of the Samsung E1200 Pusha compare to the HMD 130 Music?
The Samsung E1200 Pusha is known for its exceptionally robust build quality, designed to withstand significant physical abuse. The HMD 130 Music, while likely reasonably durable, will likely not match the Pusha's level of ruggedness due to its more complex internal components and plastic construction.
❓ Can the HMD 130 Music be used for internet browsing?
While the Unisoc 6531F chipset *technically* supports basic internet connectivity, the experience will be extremely limited due to the likely lack of a fast data connection (2G or potentially 3G) and a small, low-resolution display. It's not a practical device for regular web browsing.