Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: A Deep Dive into Foldable Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 67W wired/50W wireless charging significantly outperform the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s Tensor G4 and slower charging speeds. However, Google’s software integration and potential camera advantages may sway some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 13 | 2024, July 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 04 | Available. Released 2024, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mmFolded: 155.2 x 77.1 x 10.5 mm | Unfolded: 159.4 x 143.3 x 4.6 mm Folded: 159.4 x 73.1 x 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 257 g (9.07 oz) | 226 g or 228 g (7.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2076 x 2152 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 2224 x 2488 pixels (~418 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 207.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.98 inches, 204.1 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1700 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF (9cm - ∞), OIS, 2x optical zoom 10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 127˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Dolby Vision HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF | 16 MP, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired 7.5W wireless Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 31% in 10 min 50W wireless, 24% in 10 min |
| Type | 4650 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian, Porcelain | Black, White, Blue |
| Models | GGH2X, GC15S | - |
| Price | € 1,020.97 / $ 649.95 / £ 784.99 | About 1140 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Superior software integration with Google ecosystem
- Potentially excellent computational photography
- High peak display brightness (2199 nits)
- Slower processor (Tensor G4)
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower sustained performance due to thermal limitations
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Ultra-fast 67W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Superior performance for gaming and demanding tasks
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Camera performance relies heavily on hardware specs (currently unknown)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold boasts a measured peak brightness of 2199 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the Mix Fold 4’s brightness isn’t specified, Xiaomi typically delivers competitive displays. Both utilize foldable OLED panels, but the Pixel’s software optimizations likely focus on crease reduction and color accuracy. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices is a notable omission, but LTPO technology is expected in both to manage power consumption. The real-world difference will hinge on color calibration and hinge durability, areas where long-term testing is crucial.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Google’s Pixel line is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging AI to enhance image quality. The Tensor G4 likely prioritizes image processing speed and features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. Xiaomi typically focuses on high-resolution sensors and versatile lens configurations. The Mix Fold 4’s image quality will depend heavily on sensor size and lens apertures, which are currently unknown. The Pixel’s strength lies in software, while Xiaomi’s potential lies in hardware capabilities.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Google Tensor G4 (4nm) found in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 – offers higher clock speeds across the board compared to the Pixel’s 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, and 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s architecture generally provides better sustained performance due to superior thermal management.
Battery Life
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold achieves an active use battery score of 11:54h, a respectable result. However, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 compensates for potentially lower battery capacity with significantly faster charging. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, can add 31% charge in just 10 minutes. The 50W wireless charging, adding 24% in 10 minutes, is also a substantial advantage. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s 21W wired and 7.5W wireless charging are comparatively slow. The Mix Fold 4’s bypass charging feature, allowing direct power from the charger while the phone is on, further enhances usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you prioritize a seamless software experience deeply integrated with Google’s AI features and anticipate a strong focus on computational photography. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 if you demand the fastest possible performance for demanding tasks like gaming and content creation, and value incredibly fast charging speeds to minimize downtime. The Mix Fold 4 is geared towards power users, while the Pixel caters to those within the Google ecosystem.