Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Tecno Phantom V Fold2: A Deep Dive into Foldable Futures
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software integration and a brighter display, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold emerges as the winner. However, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 delivers significantly faster charging and a more powerful chipset for those who demand peak performance and don't mind a less polished software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 13 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 04 | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mmFolded: 155.2 x 77.1 x 10.5 mm | Unfolded: 159 x 140.4 x 6.1 mmFolded: 159 x 72.2 x 11.8-12 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 257 g (9.07 oz) | 249 g (8.78 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2076 x 2152 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 207.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 127˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired 7.5W wireless Bypass charging | 70W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 49 min 15W wireless |
| Type | 4650 mAh | 5750 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian, Porcelain | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
| Models | GGH2X, GC15S | AE10 |
| Price | € 1,020.97 / $ 649.95 / £ 784.99 | ₹ 69,999 |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Brighter, more usable display (2199 nits)
- Superior software integration and updates
- Excellent battery optimization (11:54h active use)
- Slower charging speed (21W wired)
- Potentially less raw processing power than the Tecno
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Faster charging (70W wired, 100% in 49 min)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000+)
- Potentially better GPU performance
- Significantly dimmer display (573 nits)
- Less refined software experience
Display Comparison
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 2199 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Tecno Phantom V Fold2’s 573 nits. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display brightness difference is substantial. The Pixel likely employs LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, conserving battery, a feature not explicitly stated for the Tecno. This brightness advantage caters to users who frequently consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Google’s Pixel line is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor G4’s image signal processor. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 will likely rely more on hardware specifications. Given the market positioning, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is expected to have superior image processing algorithms, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of detailed sensor information for both devices makes a definitive judgment impossible, but Google’s software advantage is a strong indicator.
Performance
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ chipset, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, offering a theoretical single-core performance edge over the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s Tensor G4 (3.1 GHz Cortex-X4). However, the Tensor G4 benefits from Google’s machine learning optimizations, potentially translating to smoother AI-driven tasks. The Dimensity 9000+’s architecture (3x A710 vs 3x A720 in the Pixel) suggests a focus on sustained performance, while the Tensor G4 prioritizes efficiency. The Pixel's Tensor G4 is built on the same 4nm process, but the architectural differences mean the Tecno will likely excel in GPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold achieves an impressive 11:54h active use score, demonstrating excellent battery optimization despite its 21W wired charging. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2, with a 9:34h score, lags behind in endurance. However, Tecno compensates with its 70W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 49 minutes – a massive advantage over the Pixel’s slower charging. The Tecno also offers 15W wireless charging, while the Pixel offers 7.5W. The Tecno’s charging speed is a clear win for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you need seamless integration with the Google ecosystem, prioritize a vibrant and exceptionally bright display for outdoor use, and value consistent software updates. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 if you prefer blazing-fast 70W charging, demand maximum processing power for demanding tasks, and are comfortable with a less refined software experience.