Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Supremacy

The foldable phone market is heating up, with Google and Oppo offering compelling visions of the future. We pit the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, representing Google’s software-first approach to foldables, against the Oppo Find N3 Flip, known for its refined design and fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right foldable for your lifestyle.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Oppo Find N3 Flip emerges as the winner. Its nearly 13-hour active use score and 44W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. However, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s Tensor G4 chip and Google’s software integration may appeal to those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.

PHONES
Phone Names Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Oppo Find N3 Flip
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, August 132023, August 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, September 04Available. Released 2023, September 08
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum framePlastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mmFolded: 155.2 x 77.1 x 10.5 mmUnfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm
SIMNano-SIM + eSIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight257 g (9.07 oz)198 g (6.98 oz)
Display
Resolution2076 x 2152 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~373 ppi density)1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size8.0 inches, 207.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak)Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G715 MC7Immortalis-G715 MC11
OSAndroid 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgradesAndroid 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesMulti-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom EnhanceLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 127˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", PDAF50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging21W wired 7.5W wireless Bypass charging44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired
Type4650 mAhLi-Po 4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsObsidian, PorcelainCream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black
ModelsGGH2X, GC15SPHT110, CPH2519
Price€ 1,020.97 / $ 649.95 / £ 784.99About 1200 EUR
SAR EU0.98 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)-

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility
  • Google Tensor G4 optimized for AI tasks
  • Potential for superior software integration with Google services

  • Shorter battery life in active use
  • Significantly slower wired charging
  • Limited camera details in provided specs

Oppo Find N3 Flip

  • Longer battery life for all-day use
  • Much faster 44W wired charging
  • Compact flip phone form factor

  • Dimmer display compared to the Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Less emphasis on AI-specific processing
  • Limited details on camera hardware

Display Comparison

The Pixel 9 Pro Fold boasts a significantly brighter display at 2199 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s 939 nits. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the Pixel’s brighter panel will draw more power. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold likely employs an LTPO panel for variable refresh rates, conserving battery, a feature not explicitly stated for the N3 Flip. The N3 Flip’s smaller form factor, being a flip phone, inherently offers a more manageable screen size when folded, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold aims for a tablet-like experience when unfolded.

Camera Comparison

The context data for the Pixel 9 Pro Fold lacks specific camera details, but given Google’s history, it will likely emphasize computational photography and image processing. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is listed as 'Photo / Video', lacking specifics. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oppo typically focuses on versatile camera systems, and the N3 Flip likely features a capable main sensor. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Pixel 9 Pro Fold suggests Google is focusing on software enhancements rather than hardware leaps in this generation.

Performance

Both devices leverage 4nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s Google Tensor G4 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.1 GHz, promising strong single-core performance. The Oppo Find N3 Flip utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 with a Cortex-X3 core at 3.05 GHz. While clock speeds are close, the Dimensity 9200 generally demonstrates superior GPU performance, potentially benefiting graphically intensive tasks. The Pixel’s Tensor G4 prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, while the Dimensity 9200 focuses on raw processing power. Both likely feature LPDDR5X RAM, but specific speeds aren’t provided.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find N3 Flip demonstrably wins in battery endurance, achieving 12:58 hours of active use compared to the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s 11:54 hours. This nearly one-hour difference is significant for all-day users. Furthermore, the N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 23 minutes, is substantially faster than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s 21W wired charging. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold does offer 7.5W wireless charging and bypass charging, features absent in the N3 Flip, but the charging speed disparity remains a key advantage for Oppo.

Buying Guide

Buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you need seamless integration with Google services, prioritize a potentially more optimized software experience for foldable use cases, and value the latest Google AI features. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prefer a longer-lasting battery, significantly faster charging speeds, and a more compact, pocketable foldable design. The N3 Flip is ideal for users who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day and need quick power top-ups.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Google Tensor G4 in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold experience significant throttling under sustained load, like during extended gaming sessions?
While the Tensor G4 benefits from a 4nm process, Google’s Tensor chips have historically been known to prioritize efficiency over sustained peak performance. Throttling is possible during prolonged intensive tasks, but Google’s software optimizations aim to mitigate this. Independent testing will be crucial to determine the extent of throttling in real-world scenarios.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Oppo Find N3 Flip and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, considering the different folding mechanisms?
The Oppo Find N3 Flip utilizes a redesigned hinge minimizing the crease and improving durability. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s hinge design is less detailed in available information. Oppo has a strong track record with foldable hinge reliability, and the N3 Flip’s design appears robust. Long-term durability testing is needed to definitively assess the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s hinge performance.
❓ Is the 7.5W wireless charging on the Pixel 9 Pro Fold fast enough for convenient overnight top-ups?
7.5W wireless charging is relatively slow compared to wired options. While suitable for overnight charging, it won’t provide a significant boost in a short amount of time. Users prioritizing quick charging will find the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging far more convenient.