Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. OnePlus Open: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the OnePlus Open emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset consistently outperforms the Tensor G4, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s software integration and potentially superior camera algorithms make it a compelling choice for Google ecosystem devotees.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | OnePlus Open |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 13 | 2023, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 04 | Available. Released 2023, October 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Ceramic Guard) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mmFolded: 155.2 x 77.1 x 10.5 mm | Unfolded: 153.4 x 143.1 x 5.8 mmFolded: 153.4 x 73.3 x 11.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 257 g (9.07 oz) | 239 g or 245 g (8.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2076 x 2152 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 2268 x 2440 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 207.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.82 inches, 196.7 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO3 Flexi-fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 127˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps gyro-EIS, HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.94", PDAF | 20MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm Cover camera: 32MP, f/2.4, 22mm (ultrawide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos enhanced) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired 7.5W wireless Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 42 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4650 mAh | Li-Po 4805 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian, Porcelain | Emerald Dusk, Voyager Black, Apex Edition |
| Models | GGH2X, GC15S | CPH2551 |
| Price | € 1,020.97 / $ 649.95 / £ 784.99 | $ 1,059.99 / € 926.54 |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.76 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility (2199 nits)
- Google’s AI-powered software features
- Potentially superior computational photography
- Slower charging speed (21W)
- Less powerful chipset (Tensor G4 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Limited charging options (no reverse wireless)
OnePlus Open
- Faster charging (67W, 42 min to 100%)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Dimmer display (1238 nits)
- Less emphasis on AI-driven software features
- Camera performance relies more on hardware
Display Comparison
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold boasts a peak brightness of 2199 nits, significantly exceeding the OnePlus Open’s 1238 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the Pixel’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use. The difference in nits suggests a more aggressive display panel and potentially higher power consumption, but the benefit of readability is substantial. Bezels are not specified, but a key differentiator will be how effectively each manufacturer minimizes them to maximize screen real estate in the folded and unfolded states.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems, the context data only highlights 'Photo / Video' for the OnePlus Open. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is anticipated to leverage Google’s renowned computational photography prowess, potentially offering superior image processing, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Sensor sizes and lens apertures are unknown, but these will be critical factors. The absence of specific camera details for the OnePlus Open suggests a focus on hardware capabilities, while the Pixel will likely emphasize software-driven enhancements. The lack of mention of a telephoto lens on either device is a notable omission, and its presence (or absence) will significantly impact their versatility.
Performance
The OnePlus Open’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset is a clear performance leader over the Google Tensor G4 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the Pixel’s Cortex-X4 at 3.1 GHz. The Open’s CPU configuration (1x3.2GHz, 2x2.8GHz, 2x2.8GHz, 3x2.0GHz) also offers a broader performance profile than the Pixel’s (1x3.1GHz, 3x2.6GHz, 4x1.92GHz). The 4nm fabrication process is shared, but Qualcomm’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance, meaning less thermal throttling during extended gaming or video rendering. The Pixel relies on Google’s AI and machine learning capabilities to optimize performance, but it cannot overcome the raw horsepower of the Snapdragon.
Battery Life
Both the Pixel 9 Pro Fold and OnePlus Open deliver remarkably similar active use battery life, with 11:54h and 11:59h respectively. This suggests efficient power management despite the demanding displays. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus Open’s 67W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 42 minutes, is significantly faster than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s 21W charging. The Open also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While the Pixel supports 7.5W wireless charging and 'bypass charging' (allowing charging while in use), the OnePlus Open’s charging speed provides a substantial real-world advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you are deeply invested in the Google ecosystem, prioritize AI-powered features, and value seamless software integration. Its strengths lie in computational photography and a user experience tailored to Google services. Buy the OnePlus Open if you demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and appreciate blazing-fast charging speeds. It’s the ideal choice for power users who want a no-compromise foldable experience.