Google Pixel 7a vs Motorola Edge 40: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 takes the lead with its significantly faster charging, longer battery life, and powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset. However, the Pixel 7a's renowned camera and clean Android experience remain strong selling points, making it a solid choice for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 7a | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 10 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR, 90Hz | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MP7 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4385 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality
- Clean and smooth Android experience
- Guaranteed software updates
- Compact and comfortable design
- Slower charging speed
- Shorter battery life
- Performance not as strong as competitors
- Tensor G2 chipset can be inconsistent
Motorola Edge 40
- Blazing-fast 68W wired charging
- Longer battery life
- Powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- Vibrant and bright display
- Competitive price
- Camera not as impressive as Pixel 7a
- Motorola's software support can be less consistent
- Design may be less premium than Pixel 7a
Display Comparison
Both phones boast impressive displays. The Edge 40 edges out the Pixel 7a with a slightly higher peak brightness (1043 nits vs 1070 nits - a negligible difference) and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks. The Edge 40 also likely has a smoother 144Hz refresh rate (assumed, not explicitly stated), while the Pixel 7a is likely 90Hz. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
This is where the Pixel 7a shines. Google's computational photography is legendary, and the Pixel 7a consistently produces stunning images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. While the Edge 40's camera is capable, it doesn't quite match the Pixel's image processing prowess. Video quality is likely comparable, but the Pixel's software enhancements could give it a slight edge.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Pixel 7a's Tensor G2. While the Tensor G2 is optimized for Google's AI features, the Dimensity 8020 generally delivers faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. Gaming performance will likely be better on the Edge 40.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 clearly wins in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 98h significantly surpasses the Pixel 7a's 76h. Coupled with its 68W wired charging, the Edge 40 offers a much faster and more convenient charging experience.
Buying Guide
The Google Pixel 7a is ideal for users prioritizing camera quality, a seamless Android experience, and guaranteed software updates. The Motorola Edge 40 is a better fit for those seeking blazing-fast charging, a vibrant display, and strong performance at a competitive price.