Google Pixel 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software experience and camera quality, the Google Pixel 5 is the clear winner. While the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW offers faster 25W charging, the Pixel 5’s superior endurance rating of 95 hours and clean software make it the more refined and long-lasting choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 5 | Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 258, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave - GD1YQ | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6 - GTT9Q | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 30 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, October 15 | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 144.7 x 70.4 x 8 mm (5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 151 g (5.33 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 87.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0 12W wireless 5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4080 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Just Black, Sorta Sage | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | GD1YQ, GTT9Q, G5NZ6 | SM-A716V |
| Price | € 181.31 / $ 272.44 / £ 136.00 | - |
| SAR | - | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | $ 194.84 | - |
| RENEWED | $ 253.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 95h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
Google Pixel 5
- Exceptional camera quality and software processing
- Long-lasting battery life (95h endurance)
- Clean and smooth Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Slower 18W charging
- Smaller display size may not appeal to all users
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Potentially larger display for immersive viewing
- Competitive price point
- Samsung’s One UI software may not be preferred by all
- Likely inferior camera performance compared to Pixel 5
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset, but diverge significantly in display characteristics. The Pixel 5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 699 nits, offering excellent visibility outdoors, while the A71 5G UW’s brightness is not specified, suggesting it may be less vibrant in direct sunlight. Both displays have an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The Pixel 5’s smaller size contributes to a more compact form factor, potentially appealing to users who prefer one-handed operation. The A71 5G UW likely has a larger display, but without specific details, it's difficult to assess its impact on viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones share the same chipset, their camera systems are likely to differ significantly in image processing. The Pixel 5 is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s software algorithms to produce stunning images, particularly in low light. The A71 5G UW’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but Samsung typically emphasizes vibrant colors and scene optimization. Without sensor size or aperture information for the A71 5G UW, it’s difficult to assess its low-light capabilities relative to the Pixel 5. The Pixel 5’s strength lies in its consistent image quality across all scenarios, while the A71 5G UW may excel in specific conditions.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Pixel 5 and Galaxy A71 5G UW are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) with the same CPU configuration – an octa-core setup featuring 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means comparable performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, thermal management could differ. The Pixel 5’s smaller chassis might lead to more aggressive throttling under sustained load, while the A71 5G UW’s larger size could offer slightly better heat dissipation. Both devices feature 8GB of RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking.
Battery Life
The Pixel 5 achieves an impressive endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating excellent battery life despite its relatively modest capacity. The A71 5G UW, however, compensates for a potentially smaller battery with significantly faster 25W wired charging compared to the Pixel 5’s 18W charging. This means the A71 5G UW can replenish its battery much quicker, a crucial advantage for users who frequently run low on power. The Pixel 5 also supports 12W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, features absent in the A71 5G UW.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 5 if you need a consistently smooth software experience, exceptional camera performance in all lighting conditions, and value long-term software support. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a larger display, and are comfortable with Samsung’s One UI software experience.