Pixel 4 vs. Galaxy S10 Lite: A Battle of Endurance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and usability, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is the clear winner. Its significantly superior 110-hour endurance rating, coupled with 45W fast charging, overshadows the Pixel 4’s strengths in software and camera processing. While the Pixel 4 offers a cleaner Android experience, the S10 Lite’s battery advantage is too substantial to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 4 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 15 | 2020, January 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2019, October 22 | Available. Released 2020, February 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 147.1 x 68.8 x 8.2 mm (5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 in) | 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 80.7 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 90Hz, HDR | Super AMOLED Plus, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, Super Steady OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 2800 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue |
| Models | G020M, G020I, GA01188-US, GA01187-US, GA01189-US, GA01191-US, GA01189-US | SM-G770F, SM-G770F/DS, SM-G770F/DSM, SM-G770U1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -71.5dB / Crosstalk -69.8dB | Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -94.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 62h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 79dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 83dB | -27.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 395351 (v8) GeekBench: 2542 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 370751 (v7), 459497 (v8) GeekBench: 11151 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Google Pixel 4
- Superior camera software and image processing
- Compact and pocketable design
- Clean and streamlined Android experience
- Poor battery life (62h endurance)
- Slow charging speed (18W)
- Lower display brightness
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
- Excellent battery life (110h endurance)
- Fast 45W charging
- Brighter and more visible display
- Larger and heavier design
- Samsung’s One UI software (preference-based)
- Less refined camera software
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 705 nits compared to the Pixel 4’s 423 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the S10 Lite’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and usable experience in various lighting conditions. While both are excellent, the S10 Lite’s display is demonstrably better for outdoor use and overall visual punch.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer capable photo and video recording, but approach it differently. The Pixel 4 excels in computational photography, leveraging Google’s software algorithms to produce stunning images, particularly in low light. The S10 Lite, while lacking the Pixel’s software magic, still delivers excellent image quality thanks to its hardware. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Pixel 4’s strength lies in its image processing, while the S10 Lite relies more on raw hardware capabilities. Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Pixel 4’s software is a key differentiator.
Performance
Both the Pixel 4 and Galaxy S10 Lite are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power is virtually identical for everyday tasks and most games. However, the S10 Lite’s larger battery capacity allows it to sustain peak performance for longer periods without thermal throttling, potentially offering a smoother experience during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 4, with its smaller battery, may experience more noticeable performance dips under sustained load.
Battery Life
The most significant difference between these two phones lies in their battery performance. The Galaxy S10 Lite achieves an impressive endurance rating of 110 hours, nearly double the Pixel 4’s 62 hours. This translates to a full day of heavy use, or even two days of moderate use, on the S10 Lite. Furthermore, the S10 Lite supports 45W wired charging, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Pixel 4’s 18W PD2.0 charging. The Pixel 4’s battery life is a known weakness, and the S10 Lite comprehensively addresses this concern.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 4 if you prioritize a streamlined Android experience, Google’s unique camera software features, and a more compact form factor. You’ll accept compromises in battery life and charging speed for these benefits. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite if you value all-day battery life, incredibly fast 45W charging, and a brighter display, even if it means a slightly less refined software experience and a larger device.